Teams

SAN FRAN ST U 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesTomoko Kunita / Mirella Bucci vs Mimi Wong / Annabelle Frankl1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesStephanie Harvey vs Sara Singerman5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCynthia Newton / Victoria Zaroff vs Priya Shete / Neeta Thakur4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAnny Hong / Jessica Pfannenstiel vs Karen Forsthoff / Lois Anne Indorf2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Kendall Laidlaw
published
3.38
Catherine Saul
published 3.5
3.33
Stephanie Harvey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.30
Ieda Garcia
published
Dana Stevenson
published 3.5
3.22
Mirella Bucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Jessica Pfannenstiel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Karen Brandman
published
3.14
Kelly Alberta
published
3.13
Tomoko Kunita
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Anny Hong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Tina Freschi
published
2.96
2.87
Helen Y Chang
published
2.82
Eyerusalem Gettiye
published
2.69
Ann Capitan
published 3
2.66
Crystal Gurr
published 3
2.53
Amy Gregg
published 3
Victoria Zaroff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Pfannenstiel + Kelly Alberta6261% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendall Laidlaw
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Catherine Saul
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Stephanie Harvey
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Ieda Garcia
51W–38L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Dana Stevenson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mirella Bucci
16W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Jessica Pfannenstiel
20W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Karen Brandman
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Kelly Alberta
27W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Tomoko Kunita
12W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
3
Anny Hong
23W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
Tina Freschi
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Ashley Pellouchoud
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Helen Y Chang
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
Eyerusalem Gettiye
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Ann Capitan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Crystal Gurr
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Amy Gregg
7W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Victoria Zaroff
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.