Teams

ROUND HILL CC 55AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesSteve Meyer / Manish Patel vs Mike Connerley / Allen Sherbal6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Munekawa / Robert Gallo vs Benito Feria / Wayne Spencer2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTimothy Holz / Paul Bleeg vs Dennis Ciriaco / Christopher Hanford0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Steve Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
John Haburjak
published
3.41
Mark Munekawa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Richard Sipos
published
3.31
Kevin Katari
published
3.25
Jonathan Jaffe
published
3.23
Jeffrey Nornhold
published
3.11
Jeffrey Nipp
published
3.10
Gregory Kapust
published
3.05
Ken Haworth
published
3.01
Paul Steele
published
3.01
Dave Grout
published 3.5
2.99
Timothy Holz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
David Takeuchi
published 3.5
2.97
Ricardo Angel
published
2.79
Edgar Vant
published
Gary Mintz
published
Paul Bleeg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Takeuchi + John Haburjak123 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Katari + Richard Sipos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steve Meyer
13W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
John Haburjak
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Mark Munekawa
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.41
Richard Sipos
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Kevin Katari
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Jonathan Jaffe
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Jeffrey Nornhold
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jeffrey Nipp
8W–25L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Gregory Kapust
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Ken Haworth
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Paul Steele
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Dave Grout
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Timothy Holz
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3.5
David Takeuchi
5W–17L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Ricardo Angel
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Edgar Vant
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Gary Mintz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Bleeg
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.