Teams

Vineyards

2024 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-08vs Island Walk - ConawayLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobyn Manners / Mary Caruso vs Mary Conaway / Jill Seitz2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Howe / Mary Ann Paradiso vs Katherine Schommer / Iryna Hryhorenko6-7, 1-6
2023-12-01vs Sterling Oaks - BergstromLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Caruso / Robyn Manners vs Sarah Bergstrom / DEBORAH Eck2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie Howe / Mary Ann Paradiso vs Roseann McGee / Anne Pauls1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesMary Caruso / Karen Fredrickson vs Cathleen Calarco / Cathy Miles0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Howe / Molly Monette vs Lori Wolanski / Marthese Doerner4-6, 4-6
2023-11-17vs Valencia Bonita - YagodaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Caruso / Melanie Howe vs Eva Migacz / Patricia Doran5-7, 3-6
2023-11-10vs Naples Beach Hotel - TitmusLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Caruso / Melanie Howe vs Martha Scott / Susan Novinski2-6, 1-6
2023-11-03vs Village Walk Bonita - J. MartinLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Fredrickson / Melanie Howe vs Marcia Kenyon / Mary McIntire0-6, 1-6
2023-10-27vs COLLIER/ Farnham/55&over6.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Fredrickson / Melanie Howe vs Barbara Country / Kerry Turner3-6, 4-6
2023-10-20vs Players Club - RoseLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Caruso / Molly Monette vs Melanie Rose / Janet Olliges6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Mary Caruso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Ann Robert
published 3
Karen Fredrickson
published
Mary Ann Paradiso
published
Melanie Howe
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Robyn Manners
published
Teri Solomon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Howe + Mary Caruso21041% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Howe + Teri Solomon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Caruso
63W–87L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Ann Robert
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Karen Fredrickson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Ann Paradiso
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melanie Howe
23W–105L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robyn Manners
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Teri Solomon
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.