Teams

PLEASANTON 18AW3.0A

2021 ADULT 18 & Over · Women's 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesRobin Hultgren / Rosalynd Zahiri vs Diana Rosdahl / Michelle Cooke6-1, 6-2
2021-07-11vs BAY TREES PK 18AW3.0BLost 01
L#1 SinglesRosalynd Zahiri vs Prathiba Ramamurthy3-6, 0-6
2021-07-10vs RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 18AW3.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Weiss / Rosalynd Zahiri vs Victoria Mangaser / Karen Hill6-3, 6-3
2021-06-30vs MORAGA CC 18AW3.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobin Hultgren / Rosalynd Zahiri vs Jessica Edson / Karin Hein6-0, 6-4
2021-06-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Weiss / Rosalynd Zahiri vs Elena Balletti / Teresa Cheung6-2, 6-0
2021-06-08vs BLACKHAWK CC 18AW3.0BLost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Harrington / Rosalynd Zahiri vs Tracey Hull / Jill Fissel2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobin Hultgren / Rosalynd Zahiri vs Michelle Cooke / Olga Keselman7-6, 6-3
2021-06-03vs WALNUT CREEK RC/ 18AW3.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesRosalynd Zahiri / Becky Whisenhunt vs Dana Andrew / Sabrina McQueen2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Belinda Castillo
published 3.5
3.22
Shauntae Morris
published
3.12
Rosalynd Zahiri
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.11
Michelle Weiss
published
2.92
Jan Lipnicke
published
2.84
Penny Lane
published
2.83
Fedwa Booth
published 3
2.82
Dana Brent
published 3
2.78
Cindy Harrington
published 3
2.75
Fida Musallam
published 3
2.69
Cheryl Moore
published 3
Caroline Ehrlich
published 2.5
Julie Garrahan
published
Robin Hultgren
published
Shirley Razdoroff
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Belinda Castillo
10W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.31
Shauntae Morris
49W–56L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Rosalynd Zahiri
94W–58L career · 8 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.12
Michelle Weiss
13W–13L career · no lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
3.11
Jan Lipnicke
10W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
Penny Lane
21W–14L career · no lines in 2021
0%<1%>99%
2.84
3
Fedwa Booth
12W–23L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Dana Brent
14W–18L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Cindy Harrington
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Fida Musallam
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Cheryl Moore
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Caroline Ehrlich
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Garrahan
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robin Hultgren
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shirley Razdoroff
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.