Teams

WNCB Bowie (HRC)

Adult 55 & Over USTA WNC 2023 · 55 & O 4.0 women Sat morning

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-05-13vs WNCP Harris (CS)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / ALICIA KUBIDA vs Cynthia Woody / Gaylord Chambers4-6, 2-6
2023-04-15vs WNCC Bull (HRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Angela Hare vs Dottie Mattern / Jennifer Profili1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & O 4.0 women Sat morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Beth MacDonald
published 4
3.42
Sharlyn Aamodt
published
3.42
Shelby Pedersen
published
3.35
TLynn Gilpin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Laurie Guinn
published
3.31
Angela Hare
published 3.5
3.27
Kelli Wood
published
3.21
Roberta Heinrich
published
3.15
Kenna Armstrong
published
3.11
Brenda Bowie
published 3.5
3.11
ALICIA KUBIDA
published 3.5
2.89
Elaine Liddy
published
2.89
Sheri Sparks
published
2.73
Loretta Arrington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberta Heinrich + Laurie Guinn123 matchesnot enough data
Roberta Heinrich + Kelli Wood123 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Guinn + Angela Hare213 matchesnot enough data
Kelli Wood + TLynn Gilpin213 matchesnot enough data
TLynn Gilpin + Beth MacDonald213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth MacDonald
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Sharlyn Aamodt
19W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Shelby Pedersen
23W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
TLynn Gilpin
286W–221L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Laurie Guinn
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Angela Hare
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Kelli Wood
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Roberta Heinrich
9W–21L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Kenna Armstrong
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Brenda Bowie
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
ALICIA KUBIDA
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Elaine Liddy
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Sheri Sparks
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Loretta Arrington
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.