Teams

Miami/Gayle/18&over8.5W

2024 MIAMIDADE Combo 18 & Over - Day · 8.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-21vs Miami/Sosa/18&over8.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesAYelen Gragg / Lizette Ibarra vs Sandra Deering / Maria Ayarra6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNatalia Frantsevskaya / Marci Feder vs Wendy Sosa / Isabella Ratti3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarolina Rincon / Monika Olimpiew vs Rommy Chang / Alicia Senior2-6, 1-6
2024-08-08vs TeamFormanWon 20
W#1 DoublesAYelen Gragg / Michele King vs Michelle Dalmau / Jill Balli6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRENEE ALEXIS / Agnes Sarkadi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-05vs Blanchard (Ron Ehmann)Split 11
L#2 DoublesSamie Lesperance / Elena DeVera vs Bianca Alvarez / Alison McLaughlin4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAYelen Gragg / Michele King vs Maria Hulett / Estefania Lacoa6-2, 6-2
2024-07-28vs Miami/Sosa/18&over8.5WWon 21
L#1 DoublesSamie Lesperance / Monika Olimpiew vs Sandra Deering / Maria Ayarra4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMichele King / AYelen Gragg vs Leocadie Ahmes / Rommy Chang6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDiana C Cardenas / Rossana OKAMURA vs Wendy Sosa / Isabella Ratti6-3, 7-5
2024-07-27vs Valls (Crandon Park)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAYelen Gragg / Rossana OKAMURA vs Barbara Viscito / Rose Haney6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRENEE ALEXIS / Natalia Frantsevskaya vs Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero / Rocio Zamorano6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAgnes Sarkadi / Lizette Ibarra vs Susie Valls / Kelly Dawson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2024-07-06vs Valls (Crandon Park)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAYelen Gragg / Michele King vs Ivy Touchstone / Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarci Feder / Elena DeVera vs Barbara Viscito / Gricel Boto Bernales5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSamie Lesperance / Lizette Ibarra vs Katherine Kelly / Maite Blanco6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-23vs TeamFormanWon 30
W#1 DoublesRossana OKAMURA / Diana C Cardenas vs Silvia Cortes / Surya Ramesh7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSamie Lesperance / Elena DeVera vs Natalia Moll / Mira Hashe3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAYelen Gragg / Michele King vs Tiffany Ortiz / Andrea Cepero6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
AYelen Gragg
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.41
Diana C Cardenas
published 4.5
4.26
Samie Lesperance
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
RENEE ALEXIS
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Valeria Ricotta
published 4.5
4.03
Marci Feder
published
4.02
Michele King
published
3.99
Lizette Ibarra
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Monika Olimpiew
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.90
Elena DeVera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Natalia Frantsevskaya
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Asel Ashergold
published 4
3.73
Rossana OKAMURA
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Audrey Gayle
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

AYelen Gragg + Samie Lesperance7061% games+8.6% vs expected
Monika Olimpiew + Natalia Frantsevskaya181252% games+7.7% vs expected
Valeria Ricotta + AYelen Gragg12263% games+6.7% vs expected
Monika Olimpiew + Rossana OKAMURA8751% games+6.2% vs expected
Natalia Frantsevskaya + Samie Lesperance10555% games+5.7% vs expected
Natalia Frantsevskaya + Rossana OKAMURA7751% games−1.8% vs expected
Samie Lesperance + RENEE ALEXIS6245% games−2.4% vs expected
Monika Olimpiew + Samie Lesperance7358% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
AYelen Gragg
83W–23L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.50
4.5
Diana C Cardenas
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Samie Lesperance
247W–110L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
RENEE ALEXIS
92W–123L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Valeria Ricotta
48W–37L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.04
Marci Feder
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
4.03
Michele King
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Lizette Ibarra
154W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Monika Olimpiew
283W–168L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Elena DeVera
235W–145L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Natalia Frantsevskaya
169W–134L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Asel Ashergold
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Rossana OKAMURA
267W–161L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Audrey Gayle
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.