Teams

Preisser/Men‘s3.5/40andOver

OBX Adult 40 & OVER · 3.5 MEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-21vs Stathis/Manteo/40+ Mens3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin McKeever / Steve Thompson vs Nicholas Stathis / Russ Sarbora2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMark Preisser / Jeffrey Chase vs Paul Amble / Kevin Zygler1-6, 4-6
2026-05-11vs Stathis/Manteo/40+ Mens3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Coplan / Larry Wall vs Russ Sarbora / Paul Amble1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Farmer / Jeffrey Chase vs Kevin Zygler / Thomas Fleming6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-30vs Stathis/Manteo/40+ Mens3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Farmer / Steve Thompson vs Maeyan Golasa / Russ Sarbora2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKevin Cook / Kevin McKeever vs Nicholas Stathis / David Hurley1-6, 3-6
2026-04-23vs Stathis/Manteo/40+ Mens3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Rubino / Bo Rhodes vs Maeyan Golasa / Thomas Fleming6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Coplan / Mark Preisser vs Russ Sarbora / Benjamin Morris6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRobert Farmer / Kevin Cook vs Robert Gomez / John del Vecchio5-7, 2-6
2026-04-16vs Stathis/Manteo/40+ Mens3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesSteve Thompson / Kevin McKeever vs Maeyan Golasa / Russ Sarbora7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Farmer / Larry Wall vs Robert Gomez / Benjamin Morris3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Coplan / Kevin Cook vs Kevin Zygler / John del Vecchio6-2, 6-2
2026-04-09vs Stathis/Manteo/40+ Mens3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Rubino / Steve Thompson vs Maeyan Golasa / Thomas Fleming2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Coplan / Tom Acree vs Nicholas Stathis / Robert Gomez0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Chase / Mark Preisser vs Kevin Zygler / Paul Amble7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-04-02vs Stathis/Manteo/40+ Mens3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesSteve Thompson / Brian Rubino vs Maeyan Golasa / Nicholas Stathis6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKevin McKeever / Larry Wall vs David Hurley / Robert Gomez5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBo Rhodes / Tom Acree vs Benjamin Morris / Thomas Fleming6-2, 6-3
2026-03-26vs Stathis/Manteo/40+ Mens3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Rubino / Gregory Wills vs Nicholas Stathis / Maeyan Golasa3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKevin McKeever / Jeffrey Chase vs Russ Sarbora / Kevin Zygler6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTom Acree / Bo Rhodes vs Benjamin Morris / Cory Taylor6-1, 6-2
2026-03-19vs Stathis/Manteo/40+ Mens3.5Split 11
W#2 DoublesDavid Coplan / Kevin McKeever vs Kevin Zygler / Robert Gomez6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Farmer / Gregory Wills vs Thomas Fleming / Benjamin Morris1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stathis/Manteo/40+ Mens3.56318926207
2Preisser/Men‘s3.5/40andOver3691840262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Brian Rubino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
David Coplan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Larry Wall
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Kevin McKeever
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Tom Acree
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Bo Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Robert Farmer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.18
Mark Preisser
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Kevin Cook
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Gregory Wills
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Acree + Bo Rhodes4166% games+9.3% vs expected
Tom Acree + David Coplan6356% games+2.5% vs expected
Brian Rubino + Bo Rhodes2646% games−10.2% vs expected
Kevin McKeever + Gregory Wills0547% gamesnot enough data
Kevin McKeever + Bo Rhodes213 matchesnot enough data
Tom Acree + Mark Preisser123 matchesnot enough data
Brian Rubino + Gregory Wills123 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Wills + Robert Farmer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Rubino
34W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
David Coplan
37W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Larry Wall
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
Kevin McKeever
47W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Tom Acree
39W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Bo Rhodes
31W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Robert Farmer
13W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Mark Preisser
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Kevin Cook
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Gregory Wills
15W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.