Teams

Johnson/40's 3.5AW/Mon/For

2025 Monroe Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Monroe (40&O) Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-23vs McIntyre/40's /3.5W/MacLost 04
L#1 DoublesMartha Lancaster / Christy Brown vs Sherry Hamilton / Debra Cox5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAndi Holyfield vs Milly McIntyre2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Johnson / Kathy Patrick vs Julie Johnson / Brenda Hilburn2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Ritchie / Sheri Pippin vs Kimberly Leija / Sharon Dollins7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-22vs McIntyre/40's /3.5W/MacLost 04
L#1 DoublesMartha Lancaster / Christy Brown vs Sherry Hamilton / Debra Cox4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAndi Holyfield vs Milly McIntyre3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLisa Johnson / Kathy Patrick vs Julie Johnson / Brenda Hilburn5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Ritchie / Sheri Pippin vs Kimberly Leija / Sharon Dollins4-6, 4-6
2025-03-16vs McIntyre/40's /3.5W/MacLost 13
L#1 DoublesKathy Patrick / Lisa Johnson vs Marsha Cobb / Wesley Johnson1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAndi Holyfield vs Lynn Barron5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMartha Lancaster / Christy Brown vs Dianne Graham / Diana Breen7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaura Bennett / Anita House vs Lisa Edwards / Misti Hajj3-6, 3-6
2025-03-12vs McIntyre/40's /3.5W/MacLost 13
L#1 DoublesKathy Patrick / Lisa Johnson vs Marsha Cobb / Wesley Johnson1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAndi Holyfield vs Lynn Barron3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMartha Lancaster / Christy Brown vs Dianne Graham / Diana Breen6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaura Bennett / Anita House vs Lisa Edwards / Misti Hajj0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Monroe (40&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amanda Ritchie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Martha Lancaster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Andi Holyfield
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.98
Anita House
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Kathy Patrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sheri Pippin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Ritchie
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Lancaster
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Andi Holyfield
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3.5
Anita House
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Kathy Patrick
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Sheri Pippin
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.