← Teams

THPRD-Shull

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.2 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Steve Vanderploeg
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.17
Luke Filose
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.05
Zhi George
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.89
Charles Taguet
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.87
Christopher Perez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Halle Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Justin Shull
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Kelly Mohr
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.55
Margaret Sivertsen
published 4
3.47
Kana Wakamatsu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2019-12-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesZhi George / Christopher Perez vs Catherine Go / Christian Casebeer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJustin Shull / Halle Jackson vs Kim Wright / Zachary Wright6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Mohr / Charles Taguet vs Jean Herbst / Patrick Herbst6-0, 6-1
2019-11-23Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesTraci Harris / Luke Filose vs Mary Hlady / Rusty Williams6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHalle Jackson / Michael Cheng vs Brian Dehen / Amy Murphy5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2019-11-15Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKelly Mohr / Steve Vanderploeg vs Jana Hirst / Michael Yee7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Tran / Christopher Perez vs Sam Aiello / Sally Murdoch6-2, 6-4
2019-10-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJustin Shull / Halle Jackson vs Eric Lee / Sally Murdoch6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesZhi George / SALVADOR ESTRADA vs Jack Carlson / Jennifer Richman6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelly Mohr / Charles Taguet vs Neville Mehta / Kerstin Anderson6-2, 6-3
2019-10-20Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLevi Huddleston / Zhi George vs Brenner Daniels / Megan Daniels6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Mohr / Steve Vanderploeg vs Amanda Wiley / Duy Nguyen6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJustin Shull / Kana Wakamatsu vs Kevin Jarvis / Sarah Ferrer6-1, 6-3
2019-10-13Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesHalle Jackson / SALVADOR ESTRADA vs Kristi Vargas / John St Claire6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Tran / Christopher Perez vs Itsuko Day / David Tinsley6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTraci Harris / Luke Filose vs John Christiaan / Melissa Light6-3, 6-4
2019-10-05Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesHalle Jackson / Michael Cheng vs Kevin Hughes / Allison Fryman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Mohr / Steve Vanderploeg vs Shane Wilson / Sherri Sacconaghi6-0, 6-4
2019-09-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKelly Mohr / Michael Cheng vs Linda Paulk / Keith Johnson7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHalle Jackson / Levi Huddleston vs Jana Corder / Soren Coughlin-Glaser6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Tran / Christopher Perez vs Ken Nichols / Ashleigh Kayser7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Steve Vanderploeg
157W–111L career
0%99%1%
4.21
4.5
Luke Filose
106W–43L career
1%99%0%
4.17
4.5
Zhi George
116W–51L career
8%92%0%
4.05
4.5
Charles Taguet
104W–63L career
41%59%0%
3.89
4
Christopher Perez
48W–30L career
0%96%4%
3.87
4
Halle Jackson
123W–58L career
0%99%1%
3.82
4
Justin Shull
136W–38L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Kelly Mohr
115W–58L career
8%92%0%
3.61
4
Margaret Sivertsen
39W–44L career
24%76%0%
3.55
4
Kana Wakamatsu
60W–63L career
42%58%0%
3.47

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.