← Teams

SAC-Jou

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Balasubramanian VembuSrinivasan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.08
Jan Wich-Herrlein
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
3.97
Austin Jou
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Michael Jung
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Richard Shih
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.50
Vimal Natarajan
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
Results8 ties
2024-06-23Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAjay Kumar Tippisetti / Richard Shih vs Justin Greene / Jeb Hubbs6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichael Jung vs Rudd McGarity6-3, 7-5
2024-06-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAugusto Carneiro / Jan Wich-Herrlein vs Eugene Jung / Juan Presichi6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAustin Jou vs Makoto Yoshino6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAjay Kumar Tippisetti / Michael Jung vs Daniel Larsen / Brian Jackson6-3, 6-1
2024-06-09Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesAustin Jou / Jan Wich-Herrlein vs John Robb / Joerg Droste6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBalasubramanian VembuSrinivasan vs Jorge Fuenmayor4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Shih / Michael Jung vs Gareth Hosford / Luke Filose6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVimal Natarajan / Ajay Kumar Tippisetti vs Kameron Johnson / Leo Keppinger7-6, 6-1
2024-06-02Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKen Blancher / Jan Wich-Herrlein vs Frank Collie / Charles Taguet6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAustin Jou vs Mihirkant Upadhyaya6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Jung / Richard Shih vs Todd Klindt / Jeb Hubbs7-5, 6-2
2024-05-18Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesAugusto Carneiro / Balasubramanian VembuSrinivasan vs David White / Todd Siegel6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJan Wich-Herrlein vs Nathan Austin6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKen Blancher / Richard Shih vs Christopher Haddon / Ryan Pitman5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrad Wade / Vimal Natarajan vs Ken Schwerd / Brian McDonagh3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-04Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJan Wich-Herrlein / Augusto Carneiro vs Corey Kincaid / Greg Masson6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAustin Jou vs Andrew Nilsson7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBalasubramanian VembuSrinivasan / Nishant Lakshman vs Ke Ounaphom / Bruce Sylva4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-27Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBalasubramanian VembuSrinivasan / Jan Wich-Herrlein vs Anthony Nelson / David Sturdyvin6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAustin Jou vs Sherwood Newell6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Shih / Brad Wade vs Mike Mon / Todd Kuribayashi2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-20Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesAustin Jou / Balasubramanian VembuSrinivasan vs Jon Griesser / Adrian Polliack6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJan Wich-Herrlein vs Mariano Pastor1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrad Wade / Richard Shih vs Jon Monson / Michael Laport6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAjay Kumar Tippisetti / Vimal Natarajan vs Jason Crawford / Hector M Salomon6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Balasubramanian VembuSrinivasan
19W–31L career
4%95%0%
4.12
4.5
Jan Wich-Herrlein
25W–19L career
6%94%0%
4.08
4.5
Austin Jou
11W–45L career
26%74%0%
3.97
4
Michael Jung
67W–37L career
0%99%1%
3.83
4
Richard Shih
7W–49L career
0%98%2%
3.83
4
Vimal Natarajan
78W–95L career
34%66%0%
3.50

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.