Teams

SRTC-Boykin

2023 OH OV WINTER A55&O · 2023 Winter A55&O 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2023 Winter A55&O 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Lindsay Bremar
published
3.29
Stacie Remaly
published
3.17
Lori James
published
3.15
Janet Culley
published
3.10
Chetana Wilkins
published 3.5
3.03
Cheryl Shimmin
published 3.5
2.71
Janice Bensman
published
2.70
Deidra Boykin
published 3.5
Cheryl Long
published
Melissa Deshurko
published
Pam Howell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Bremar + Cheryl Shimmin5751% games+9.5% vs expected
Chetana Wilkins + Lindsay Bremar12755% games+9.0% vs expected
Janice Bensman + Cheryl Shimmin3744% games+4.3% vs expected
Janet Culley + Lindsay Bremar271655% games+4.1% vs expected
Lindsay Bremar + Lori James11455% games+0.5% vs expected
Stacie Remaly + Cheryl Shimmin5253% games+0.1% vs expected
Chetana Wilkins + Lori James6551% games−0.4% vs expected
Cheryl Shimmin + Lori James4839% games−10.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Bremar
133W–140L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Stacie Remaly
105W–126L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Lori James
92W–109L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Janet Culley
52W–64L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Chetana Wilkins
81W–92L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cheryl Shimmin
83W–127L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Candace Holthouse
48W–85L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janice Bensman
101W–227L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
3.5
Deidra Boykin
24W–48L career · type S · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
2.70
Cheryl Long
11W–47L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Deshurko
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pam Howell
64W–111L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.