Teams

McMullen Halm MXD

2023 Pinellas Mixed 18 & Over Spring · 7.0 MXD Sunday

13 players · average NTRP 3.69 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-22vs Pinellas/Fantauzzo/Mixed18&Over7.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesIrene Hughes / Andrew DePasquale vs Barry Michael / Sandra Michael7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristopher Whalen / Lisa Oonk vs Isabelle Conti / Corbin Newquist6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesIrene Hughes / Andrew DePasquale vs Silvie Bahulova / Jason Saposnik4-2
2023-05-21vs Treasure Bay XLost 01
L#2 DoublesLita Hollister / Daniel McKinney vs Julia Pierce / Greg Barker2-6, 0-6
2023-05-07vs Pinellas/Fantauzzo/Mixed18&Over7.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Oonk / Christopher Whalen vs Jamie Dennis / Holly Dennis7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2023-04-23vs SPCC HagmanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesIrene Hughes / Andrew DePasquale vs Matt Warticki / Lina Chaves6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Oonk / Christopher Whalen vs Steve Gardiner / Melanie Powell6-3, 6-3
2023-04-16vs Treasure Bay XLost 01
L#2 DoublesLita Hollister / Daniel McKinney vs Julia Pierce / Henri Pichal5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MXD Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Lisa Oonk
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.77
Michael Rossi
published
3.75
Cambria Whalen
published 4
3.45
Lita Hollister
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Brandon Halm
published 3.5
3.43
3.31
Andrew DePasquale
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Chi Ming Yu
published 3.5
3.20
Daniel McKinney
published 3.5
3.14
Karen Fischer
published
2.88
Danielle Coke
published 3.5
George Hawkins
published
Kyle Robertshaw
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Oonk
217W–231L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Michael Rossi
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Cambria Whalen
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Lita Hollister
78W–113L career · 3 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Brandon Halm
25W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
Edwin Alejandro-Vega
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Andrew DePasquale
105W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Chi Ming Yu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Daniel McKinney
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Karen Fischer
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Danielle Coke
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.88
George Hawkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kyle Robertshaw
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.