Teams

Haitham Eletrabi-YTC-18 -Tri-Level

2025 Auburn USTA 18 & Over Tri-Level · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-10vs AU - HuberdeauLost 03
L#1 DoublesGreg Niedzwiecki / Zach Tantillo vs Stephen Close / Henry Huberdeau3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLincoln Wang / Haitham Eletrabi vs Collin Jeffries / Marc Huberdeau7-5, 1-1
L#3 DoublesLamar Daniels / Parker van Dyke vs Mohamed Eldemerdash / Lamar Daniels III1-6, 4-6
2025-06-03vs AU - HuberdeauSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNeil Desai / Greg Niedzwiecki vs Marc Huberdeau / Henry Huberdeau6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHaitham Eletrabi / Lincoln Wang vs Lamar Daniels III / Collin Jeffries6-0, 6-1
2025-05-20vs AU - HuberdeauSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLincoln Wang / Haitham Eletrabi vs Tim Mitchell / Marc Huberdeau6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTaehwan Jegal / Parker van Dyke vs Lamar Daniels III / Mohamed Eldemerdash0-6, 1-6
2025-05-13vs AU - HuberdeauLost 03
L#1 DoublesGreg Niedzwiecki / Mal Sport vs James Zachry / Robert Sanchez3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesZach Tantillo / Lee Bryan vs Marc Huberdeau / Tim Mitchell6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesParker van Dyke / Arthur Forbes vs Collin Jeffries / Mohamed Eldemerdash0-6, 3-6
2025-05-06vs AU - HuberdeauLost 03
L#1 DoublesMal Sport / Greg Niedzwiecki vs Stephen Close / Henry Huberdeau4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHaitham Eletrabi / Lincoln Wang vs Mohamed Eldemerdash / Marc Huberdeau4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDerrick Frazier / Taehwan Jegal vs Lamar Daniels III / Collin Jeffries1-6, 2-6
2025-04-29vs AU - HuberdeauLost 12
W#1 DoublesMal Sport / Greg Niedzwiecki vs Stephen Close / Robert Sanchez4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid McGuirt / Zach Tantillo vs Mohamed Eldemerdash / Henry Huberdeau0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesArthur Forbes / Parker van Dyke vs Lamar Daniels III / Collin Jeffries4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Neil Desai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Mal Sport
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Greg Niedzwiecki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Lee Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Lamar Daniels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Lincoln Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
David McGuirt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.55
Parker van Dyke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Zach Tantillo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Derrick Frazier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Taehwan Jegal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Arthur Forbes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Haitham Eletrabi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mal Sport + Greg Niedzwiecki3254% games+14.8% vs expected
Haitham Eletrabi + Lincoln Wang3455% games+14.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neil Desai
71W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Mal Sport
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Greg Niedzwiecki
10W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Lee Bryan
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
Lamar Daniels
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Lincoln Wang
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
3.5
David McGuirt
3W–12L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.69
Parker van Dyke
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Zach Tantillo
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Derrick Frazier
7W–19L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
43%56%<1%
2.52
Taehwan Jegal
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.40
2.5
Arthur Forbes
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Haitham Eletrabi
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.