Teams

Howell Combo 6.5 18

2025 Decatur Southern Combo 18 and Over · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-06vs Smith Combo 6.5 18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSusie Brock / Brittnee Robinson vs Andrea Stewart / Tricia Collins6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGail Roberts / Elizabeth Burgreen vs Clesha Ward / Addison McNutt6-7, 3-6
2025-09-30vs Smith Combo 6.5 18Won 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Frith / Gabriela Revilla vs Bridget Montgomery / Clesha Ward6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Burgreen / Brittnee Robinson vs Cindy Perry / Paige Dobbins6-3, 6-0
2025-09-11vs Smith Combo 6.5 18Split 11
L#1 DoublesPatty Laughlin / Gabriela Revilla vs Tricia Collins / Susan Zinkil6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Howell / Jennifer Gidley vs Andrea Stewart / Cassandra Smith6-3, 6-3
2025-09-08vs Smith Combo 6.5 18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSusie Brock / Patty Laughlin vs Addison McNutt / Susan Zinkil1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Howell / Gail Roberts vs Bridget Montgomery / Andrea Stewart1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Gabriela Revilla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Elizabeth Burgreen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.00
Brittnee Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.94
Kelly Frith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Anna Mctaggart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Jennifer Gidley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Susie Brock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Patty Laughlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Gail Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gabriela Revilla
25W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Elizabeth Burgreen
43W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Brittnee Robinson
47W–39L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kelly Frith
37W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Anna Mctaggart
31W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Jennifer Gidley
32W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
Susie Brock
27W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Patty Laughlin
38W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Gail Roberts
20W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.