Teams

10 KRA Kirkeby 40+

2025 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-22vs 1 Kanawha WareLost 13
L#1 DoublesEllen Featherstone / Kindra Kirkeby vs Julie Ranson / Ginny Boland3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Kilberg vs Caroline Appich7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCamp Kramer / Lauren Noonkester vs Heather DeBolt / Lindsay Daniel1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSara Anderson / Meg Phillips vs Marty Edwards / Christen Trivette4-6, 2-6
2025-07-15vs 8 HCC-GerczakWon 40
W#1 DoublesEllen Featherstone / Christin Kettering vs Alexia Gerczak / Tracy Teal6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Kilberg vs Elizabeth Wiertel6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Anderson / Camp Kramer vs Jennifer McGeorge / Beth Stuckey6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKristen Roper / Meg Phillips vs Alison Chesson / Molly McComb5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-08vs 4 Westwood Ley - Cool RunningsLost 13
L#1 DoublesCamp Kramer / CONSTANCE MATTOX vs Melanie Grossman / Katherine Singleton3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAngela Kennedy vs Mary Douglas Rice6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Kilberg / Christin Kettering vs Lauren Connor / Jana Chesley1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Roper / Meg Phillips vs Mary Gee / Naomi Nelson3-6, 2-6
2025-06-26vs 9 MTC PattersonWon 31
W#1 DoublesCONSTANCE MATTOX / Ellen Featherstone vs Dana Chenevert / Angela Futrell6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLauren Noonkester vs Daphne Cole3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Roper / Kindra Kirkeby vs Allie Hannon / Barbara Patterson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeg Phillips / Sara Anderson vs Linda Wadkins / Wanda Huggins6-4, 7-5
2025-06-25vs 3 CCV Pierce 3.0 WeekdaySplit 22
L#1 DoublesKristen Roper / Lauren Noonkester vs Leesa Gregory / Ericka Zeballos2-6, 5-6
W#1 SinglesAngela Kennedy vs Becky Jenkins6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Kilberg / Christin Kettering vs Katie Peple / Maria Pahuja6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCamp Kramer / Meg Phillips vs Christian Brown / Patsy King2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-19vs 5 ACAC Olson/KentLost 04
L#1 DoublesKindra Kirkeby / Ellen Featherstone vs Tamsin Hepner / Ali Silva6-3, 5-5
L#1 SinglesRachel Prusek vs Laura Edwards0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStewart Lester / CONSTANCE MATTOX vs Donna Barrett / Pamela Blackburn7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSara Anderson / Meg Phillips vs Amishi Amin / Larisa Lyle3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
CONSTANCE MATTOX
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.01
Christin Kettering
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Kindra Kirkeby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Ellen Featherstone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Kristen Roper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Rachel Prusek
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Elizabeth Kilberg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Angela Kennedy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.79
Stewart Lester
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Camp Kramer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Lauren Noonkester
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.50
Nancy Bryner
published
2.36
Meg Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sara Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Kilberg + Christin Kettering7263% games+7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
CONSTANCE MATTOX
29W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Christin Kettering
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Kindra Kirkeby
15W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Ellen Featherstone
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
Kristen Roper
23W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
Rachel Prusek
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Elizabeth Kilberg
19W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Angela Kennedy
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Stewart Lester
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Camp Kramer
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Lauren Noonkester
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
2.59
Nancy Bryner
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Meg Phillips
16W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
Sara Anderson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.