Teams

Sweeney

2023 Anne Arundel Adult Other Weekday Women · Anne Arundel Adult Other Day Doubles 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-21vs JonesLost 01
L#3 DoublesDonna Worthington / Katherine Tindall vs Marie Thorne / Audrey Gunther5-7, 4-6
2023-03-15vs JonesLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Anderson / Joi Remoll vs Lisa Mendenhall / June Means3-6, 3-6
2023-03-08vs JonesWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatherine Tindall / Monica Maloney vs Shelley Williams / Nicole Gunhus6-3, 6-0
2023-02-28vs JonesWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatherine Tindall / Donna Worthington vs Marie Thorne / June Means7-6, 4-2
2023-02-20vs JonesLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatherine Tindall / Diane Wisbeck vs June Means / Maura Foran6-7, 3-3
2023-02-15vs JonesWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiane McClatchy / Donna Worthington vs Shelley Williams / Lisa Mendenhall7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-02-08vs JonesWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Sweeney / Joi Remoll vs Wendy Jones / Stephanie Burlace6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTara Ritter / Donna Worthington vs Shelley Williams / Lisa Mendenhall6-2, 6-1
2023-01-23vs JonesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoi Remoll / Karen Anderson vs Stephanie Burlace / Heather Dessalines7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDonna Worthington / Anne Bolduc vs Valeri Albert / June Means4-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult Other Day Doubles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Katherine Tindall
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Joi Remoll
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Diane Wisbeck
published 4
3.77
Karen Anderson
published
3.73
Tara Ritter
published
3.70
Diane Sweeney
published 4
3.65
Mary Jane Evans
published
3.50
Sara Wagner
published
3.38
Donna Worthington
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.32
Anne Bolduc
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joi Remoll + Katherine Tindall10264% games+3.5% vs expected
Mary Jane Evans + Diane Sweeney134 matchesnot enough data
Karen Anderson + Katherine Tindall033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katherine Tindall
151W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Joi Remoll
144W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Diane Wisbeck
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Karen Anderson
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Tara Ritter
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Diane Sweeney
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Mary Jane Evans
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Sara Wagner
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.50
3.5
Donna Worthington
129W–123L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Anne Bolduc
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.