Teams

LCTA18/Robinson/LTPDI

STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Women 8.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-08-07vs LCTA18/Hale/MPRLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacey Cordina / Kellee Edwards vs Nicole Boss / Martha Lee1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKristin Arnold / Karen Devries vs Lindsey Kutlick / Anna Torchio6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Galli / Genevieve McCutcheon vs Barnes Dix / Rebecca Overdorf4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Anita Jain
published 4.5
4.25
Maria Elliott
published
4.24
Kristin Arnold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Maria Galli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Teri Robinson
published
4.13
Kellee Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Christina Liegl
published 4.5
3.99
Karen Devries
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.92
Anita Greene
published 4
3.88
Genevieve McCutcheon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Maryanne Chalmers
published
3.64
3.61
Stacey Cordina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Stephanie Kirkman
published
3.54
Charlotte Gerber
published 4
3.41
Cristina Garrett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Genevieve McCutcheon + Charlotte Gerber252052% games−0.4% vs expected
Christina Liegl + Teri Robinson11953% games−3.4% vs expected
Maria Elliott + Karen Devries404 matchesnot enough data
Maria Elliott + Charlotte Gerber134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anita Jain
34W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
Maria Elliott
45W–17L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.25
Kristin Arnold
32W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
4.24
Maria Galli
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Teri Robinson
60W–26L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
Kellee Edwards
25W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Christina Liegl
18W–20L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.08
Karen Devries
64W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Anita Greene
10W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
Genevieve McCutcheon
62W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
Maryanne Chalmers
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.67
Stefanie Seixas-Mikelus
44W–24L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Stacey Cordina
38W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Stephanie Kirkman
29W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Charlotte Gerber
63W–76L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Cristina Garrett
30W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.