Teams

Ja.Mellott55C

2024 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-09vs To.Blevins55CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSteve Schinkel / Greg Christopher vs Robert Caulfield / Matt Vaughn4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Dooley / Jay Gallagher vs Tim Lyon / Dan Rea6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-07vs Je.Miller55CWon 20
W#1 DoublesJay Gallagher / Jeff Dooley vs Harold Rabinovitz / Lewis Carroll3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrett Williams / Peter Flack vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-03vs Sh.Lav55CSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJay Gallagher / Steve Schinkel vs Chun Lav / JAMES Adams7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrett Williams / Peter Flack vs Christopher Bricker / Ivan Tseng4-6, 1-6
2024-09-25vs Ch.Evans55CLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrett Williams / Peter Flack vs Charles Brignac / Chris Evans0-6, 0-6
2024-09-11vs Je.Miller55CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJay Gallagher / Jeff Dooley vs Jeffrey Miller / John Hulicki2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrett Williams / Peter Flack vs Joseph Roney / Dana Creekmore7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-09-04vs To.Blevins55CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJay Gallagher / Jeff Dooley vs Jon Proulx / Matt Vaughn4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGreg Christopher / Steve Schinkel vs Jason Grieco / Dan Rea7-6, 6-3
2024-08-21vs Ch.Evans55CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrett Williams / Douglas Currie vs Charles Brignac / Jeff Keisner2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Dooley / Jay Gallagher vs Raul Louzao / Douglas Ricken6-4, 6-3
2024-08-14vs Sh.Lav55CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJay Gallagher / Jeff Dooley vs Scott Stutts / Eric Moritz6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGreg Christopher / Brett Williams vs David Carlin / JAMES Adams5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Jeff Dooley
published
3.10
James Mellott
published
3.04
Steve Schinkel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Jay Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Brett Williams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Peter Flack
published
Mark Levy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Dooley
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
James Mellott
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Steve Schinkel
24W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Jay Gallagher
78W–54L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Brett Williams
6W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Flack
11W–21L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
Mark Levy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.