Teams

Digby - PCC

2026 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-15vs Alboniga - RS HardSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJacob Guthrie / Brian Stringfellow vs Cliff Bell / Chris Kelly3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesParker Kennedy vs Ned McWilliams1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-26vs Link - RS HardLost 12
L#1 DoublesEvan Legassey / Greg Digby vs Rick Greene / Jorge Camacho3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesParker Kennedy vs Brian Young6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarty Stanovich / Giorgio Trane vs Jerome Shannon / Garrett Newton6-0, 3-4
2026-06-25vs Link - RS HardLost 12
W#1 DoublesParker Kennedy / Evan Legassey vs Jody Link / Mark Nissley3-0
L#1 SinglesGiorgio Trane vs Jorge Camacho0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Stringfellow / Jacob Guthrie vs Brian Young / Ricardo Mollison1-6, 2-6
2026-06-12vs Link - RS HardSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrian Stringfellow / Marty Stanovich vs Jorge Camacho / Ricardo Mollison3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesGreg Digby vs Garrett Newton6-3, 7-6
2026-06-09vs Alboniga - RS HardLost 03
L#1 DoublesGreg Digby / Marty Stanovich vs Trent Harmon / David Schenkel0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGiorgio Trane vs Cliff Bell0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Stringfellow / Jacob Guthrie vs Ned McWilliams / Kyle Schmitz1-6, 2-6
2026-05-19vs Alboniga - RS HardLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarty Stanovich / Brian Stringfellow vs Trent Harmon / Chris Kelly0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGreg Digby vs Cliff Bell1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesParker Kennedy / Jacob Guthrie vs Ned McWilliams / Kyle Schmitz6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Parker Kennedy
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.48
Marty Stanovich
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Greg Digby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.41
Jacob Guthrie
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Evan Legassey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Giorgio Trane
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.97
Brian Stringfellow
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Guthrie + Brian Stringfellow033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parker Kennedy
6W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
Marty Stanovich
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Greg Digby
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Jacob Guthrie
4W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Evan Legassey
3W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Giorgio Trane
2W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Brian Stringfellow
1W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.