Teams

Carnahan-Dark Knights

2023 Adult 55 & Over Winter · 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-02-16vs Ledray- No FaultsWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Bennett / Tom Henjum vs Mike Hicks / Craig Kuberski6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFrank Jossi / Michael Streater vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-09vs Ledray- No FaultsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKen Theisen / George Kimball vs Jin Chang / Paul Holten5-7, 4-6
2023-02-02vs Ledray- No FaultsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Carnahan / Paul Bennett vs Lawrence Wong / Steven Bauer6-3, 6-1
2023-01-26vs Ledray- No FaultsWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom Larson / William Schiller vs Leigh Carlson / Mike Hicks6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-19vs Ledray- No FaultsLost 02
L#2 DoublesTom Larson / William Schiller vs Paul Holten / Jin Chang3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Bennett / ERIK LARSON vs Mike Hicks / Leigh Carlson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-01-12vs Ledray- No FaultsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGeorge Kimball / Ken Theisen vs Paul Holten / Jin Chang2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Carnahan / Michael Streater vs Craig Kuberski / Lawrence Wong7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Eric Dieperink
published
3.48
William Schiller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Tom Larson
published
3.42
Michael Streater
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
ERIK LARSON
published
3.42
Tom Henjum
published
3.28
Paul Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.26
Ken Theisen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
John Carnahan
published
3.11
Frank Jossi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Streater + Tom Larson6164% games+7.3% vs expected
Ken Theisen + Paul Bennett9156% games+1.6% vs expected
John Carnahan + Frank Jossi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Dieperink
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.53
William Schiller
87W–77L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Tom Larson
25W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Michael Streater
158W–101L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
ERIK LARSON
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
Tom Henjum
3W–19L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.42
Paul Bennett
132W–88L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Ken Theisen
50W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
John Carnahan
17W–18L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.22
Frank Jossi
13W–18L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.