Teams

STSC-Rey-Rosa

2021 ADULT 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.95 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-07-18vs ACB-DeWolfLost 23
W#1 DoublesKirsten Rey-Rosa / Alejandra Reyes vs Monica Harrington / ILima Furey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMelissa Buis vs Michelle Cole0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrigitte Hamilton / Leslie Stevens vs Valerie Hauser / Paula Bearson6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAshley Smith vs Ann Francois1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesShannan Murphy-Barlow / Amy Vetter vs Diane Walker / Lindi Dewolf2-6, 5-7
2021-07-17vs ACB-DeWolfLost 14
L#1 DoublesJanelle Leavell / Alejandra Reyes vs ILima Furey / Monica Harrington3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAmy Vetter vs Michelle Cole2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesShannan Murphy-Barlow / Brigitte Hamilton vs Ann Francois / Diane Walker6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAshley Smith vs Lindi Dewolf3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCristina Ford / Leslie Stevens vs Valerie Hauser / Paula Bearson1-6, 0-6
2021-06-19vs ACB-DeWolfSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKirsten Rey-Rosa / Melissa Buis vs ILima Furey / Ann Francois0-3
L#1 SinglesJanelle Leavell vs Michelle Cole2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesShannan Murphy-Barlow / Monica Grassman vs Pam Gillet / Valerie Hauser6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBonnie Heitsch / Nancy MacMorris-Adix vs Lindi Dewolf / Pam Smith6-4, 6-3
2021-06-19vs ACB-DeWolfWon 41
L#1 DoublesJanelle Leavell / Monica Grassman vs ILima Furey / Monica Harrington6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMelissa Buis vs Elicia Putnam6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBonnie Heitsch / Nancy MacMorris-Adix vs Paula Bearson / Pam Smith6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesShannan Murphy-Barlow vs Michelle Cole6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCristina Ford / Kathy Carter vs Diane Walker / Pam Gillet2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ACB-DeWolf3111919146
2STSC-Rey-Rosa1391124190

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Shannan Murphy-Barlow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.98
Kirsten Rey-Rosa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Janelle Leavell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.89
Monica Grassman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Alejandra Reyes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Cristina Ford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Nancy MacMorris-Adix
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Leslie Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Brigitte Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Bonnie Heitsch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Melissa Buis
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Jill Habekost
published
2.33
Ashley Smith
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Amy Vetter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alejandra Reyes + Janelle Leavell9457% games+7.0% vs expected
Alejandra Reyes + Melissa Buis3355% games+4.3% vs expected
Janelle Leavell + Shannan Murphy-Barlow5753% games+4.2% vs expected
Kirsten Rey-Rosa + Leslie Stevens6256% games+2.7% vs expected
Kirsten Rey-Rosa + Shannan Murphy-Barlow231254% games−0.3% vs expected
Monica Grassman + Shannan Murphy-Barlow9553% games−1.8% vs expected
Janelle Leavell + Melissa Buis12854% games−3.5% vs expected
Jill Habekost + Nancy MacMorris-Adix2350% games−6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Shannan Murphy-Barlow
86W–71L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.00
3
Kirsten Rey-Rosa
72W–58L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Janelle Leavell
60W–50L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
2.97
Monica Grassman
47W–23L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Alejandra Reyes
39W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Cristina Ford
49W–36L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
Nancy MacMorris-Adix
37W–23L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
Leslie Stevens
30W–22L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Brigitte Hamilton
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Bonnie Heitsch
37W–23L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Melissa Buis
42W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
Jill Habekost
7W–19L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
2.52
3
Ashley Smith
3W–26L career · 2 lines in 2021
91%9%<1%
2.33
2.5
Amy Vetter
6W–33L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.