Teams

6 MRTC Williams/Arnold

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 8.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-13vs 3 Westwood Kelly/NapierLost 01
L#2 DoublesWayne Motley / Philathea Cole vs Mary Napier / Craig Heah4-6, 2-6
2022-11-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesWayne Motley / Philathea Cole vs Scott Kim / Nicola Blaha7-5, 6-4
2022-10-22vs 8 Belmont SavedoffWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarsh Baker / Stacey Johnson vs Edward Yesbeck / Stacy Lukanuski6-2, 6-4
2022-10-09vs 4 Hermitage FisherLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Ryon / Marsh Baker vs Aynsley Fisher / Rafael Lugo2-6, 5-7
2022-09-25vs 2 Avalon GreenWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarsh Baker / Stephanie Williams vs JINESH KUMAR CHINNATHAMBI / Daniela Otto6-0, 6-4
2022-09-17vs 7 Burkwood Colgin/McKelveyLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhilathea Cole / Wayne Motley vs Matthew Fogel / Robin Tyler2-6, 1-6
2022-09-10vs 9 MAC Snow 8.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesWayne Motley / Philathea Cole vs Mycael McDowell / Debbie Messmer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Susan Willard
published
Angela Gilliam
published 4.5
Eric Spivack
published 4.5
4.25
Marsh Baker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Wayne Motley
published
4.13
Blake Martin
published 4.5
3.98
Crystal Gibson
published 4
3.67
Stephanie Williams
published
3.44
Stacey Johnson
published
3.40
William Wilkins
published
3.02
Philathea Cole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Lloyd Arnold
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wayne Motley + Philathea Cole134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Willard
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Angela Gilliam
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Eric Spivack
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Marsh Baker
62W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.25
Wayne Motley
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Blake Martin
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.13
4
Crystal Gibson
24W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.98
Stephanie Williams
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.67
Stacey Johnson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
William Wilkins
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Philathea Cole
72W–89L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
Lloyd Arnold
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.