Teams

HOA/Claussen/55&Over8.0M

2023 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 8.0 Combo - Men - 55

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-06-11vs Warkentine, BobWon 21
W#1 DoublesDuane Strader / Brian Burton vs Bob Warkentine / Brian Harris6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKevin Harlan / Kenneth Havens vs Scott Enge / Terry Jackson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Ganaden / Jeffrey Spivak vs Stephen Lunsford / Bill Wilson6-2, 6-3
2023-05-07vs Warkentine, BobWon 30
W#1 DoublesTony Lee / Brian Burton vs Bob Warkentine / Stephen Lunsford6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJan Claussen / Duane Strader vs Scott Enge / Terry Jackson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShawn Beelman / Ravi Peru vs Brian Harris / Gary Dick6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Combo - Men - 55 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Ravi Peru
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Jan Claussen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Brian Burton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Duane Strader
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Kevin Harlan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Shawn Beelman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Kenneth Havens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Brad Harding
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Jeff Ganaden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeffrey Spivak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
R Scott Hanover
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ravi Peru + Shawn Beelman4357% games+2.1% vs expected
Kenneth Havens + Kevin Harlan6349% games−0.0% vs expected
Jeff Ganaden + Jan Claussen10952% games−1.4% vs expected
Duane Strader + Brian Burton6355% games−7.1% vs expected
Duane Strader + Jan Claussen5548% games−7.6% vs expected
Brad Harding + Shawn Beelman2444% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Ganaden + Brian Burton314 matchesnot enough data
Ravi Peru + Duane Strader213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ravi Peru
55W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
1%84%15%
3.86
Jan Claussen
77W–59L career · 1 line in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Brian Burton
70W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
Duane Strader
106W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Kevin Harlan
43W–38L career · 1 line in 2023
12%88%1%
3.67
Shawn Beelman
43W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Kenneth Havens
35W–51L career · 1 line in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Brad Harding
51W–88L career · 3 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Jeff Ganaden
99W–82L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
Jeffrey Spivak
31W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
R Scott Hanover
21W–31L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.