Teams

Broward - LTC/Painter

2021 Broward Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.57 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-28vs Veltri - MachenzieWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheri Puppo / Oscar Arcos vs RENEE ALEXIS / Nick Boros6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesColette Kienle / George Develasco vs Monica Morato / Cecil Hollins6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTimothy House / Andrea Cornelissen vs Wilfred Schnell / Mariel Hollins6-1, 6-0
2021-03-21vs Veltri - MachenzieLost 02
L#2 DoublesAndrea Cornelissen / James Santoro vs Mariel Hollins / Franklyn Peart1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesColette Kienle / George Develasco vs Monica Morato / Cecil Hollins3-6, 3-6
2021-03-14vs Veltri - MachenzieLost 01
L#3 DoublesJanine Burke / James Ward vs RENEE ALEXIS / Franklyn Peart6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-03-07vs Veltri - MachenzieWon 10
W#3 DoublesKelly Painter / Colette Kienle vs Cecil Hollins / Mariel Hollins6-2, 6-2
2021-02-21vs Veltri - MachenzieLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanine Burke / Timothy House vs Nick Boros / Kumiko Currie0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-01-31vs Veltri - MachenzieSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Painter / Erin Manten vs Nick Boros / RENEE ALEXIS6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSheri Puppo / Oscar Arcos vs Franklyn Peart / Joy Rabbini6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Sheri Puppo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.50
Erin Manten
published 5
4.46
Colette Kienle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.37
Andrea Cornelissen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.27
Janine Burke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
James Santoro
published 4.5
3.73
Kelly Painter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Painter + Colette Kienle2441% games−5.1% vs expected
Erin Manten + Kelly Painter3550% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Puppo + Kelly Painter224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Sheri Puppo
81W–40L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
4.65
5
Erin Manten
98W–68L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
4.50
4.5
Colette Kienle
41W–43L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Andrea Cornelissen
70W–63L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Janine Burke
266W–184L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
James Santoro
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Kelly Painter
154W–161L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.