Teams

OC Marguerite MVTC - Caroline 1030

2025 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC 3.5W WD

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-18vs OC Newport Beach TC - Katya/KimmyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJenny Thurrell / Laura Anderson vs MEGAN VILLANUEVA / Katherine Rennert6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMichelle Levene vs Lacy Alyn7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelley McBride / Diane Miller vs Kimberly Gambol / Cristina Gabriel6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Julia Bruno McAndrew
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 4
3.55
Caroline Gee
published 4
3.39
Ellen Aistars
published
3.35
Julia Keene
published
3.26
Jenny Thurrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Rita Haddad
published
3.20
Michelle Levene
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.17
Lisa Rutherford
published
3.16
Leah Dietz
published
3.10
Patty Rydelski
published
3.06
Dana Buckley
published 3.5
3.01
Kelley McBride
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Rydelski + Leah Dietz7256% games+5.3% vs expected
Ellen Aistars + Caroline Gee6753% games+5.3% vs expected
Lisa Rutherford + Kelley McBride3547% games−0.5% vs expected
Ellen Aistars + Kelley McBride123 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Gee + Julia Keene303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Julia Bruno McAndrew
61W–21L career · 9 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Caroline Gee
26W–17L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Ellen Aistars
31W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Julia Keene
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Jenny Thurrell
20W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Rita Haddad
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Michelle Levene
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Lisa Rutherford
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Leah Dietz
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.16
Patty Rydelski
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Dana Buckley
14W–22L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kelley McBride
14W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.