Teams

LVC - Robbins

2023 USTA 40 & Over League · 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-19vs RCW - Davis/ThomanWon 21
W#1 DoublesKenneth Myhre / Jeffrey Robbins vs Craig Diehl / Robert Kintner7-6, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMatt Helsel vs Robert Belser6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Garman / David Heinzelmann vs Victor Fissella / Mark Lewis0-6, 2-6
2023-07-30vs RCW - Davis/ThomanLost 13
L#1 DoublesRobert Gallo / David Heinzelmann vs Robert Belser / John Briner4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMatthew Garman vs Mark Koons1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesF Taylor Clark / Matt Helsel vs Craig Diehl / Robert Kintner3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKenneth Myhre / Jeffrey Robbins vs Victor Fissella / Kirk Thoman6-1, 6-2
2023-07-23vs RCW - Davis/ThomanLost 13
L#1 DoublesMatt Helsel / F Taylor Clark vs Tom Brink / Ben Lehman4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Robbins vs Mark Koons7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHadjh Ahrns / Kenneth Myhre vs Mark Lewis / Kirk Thoman6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMatthew Garman / Matthew Ludwig vs Robert Kintner / Robert Belser1-6, 1-6
2023-07-15vs RCW - Davis/ThomanSplit 22
L#1 DoublesF Taylor Clark / Matt Helsel vs Ben Lehman / Tom Brink2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Robbins vs Mark Koons6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKenneth Myhre / William Shambach vs Robert Belser / Michael Davis6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMatthew Garman / Hadjh Ahrns vs Kirk Thoman / Mark Lewis2-6, 2-6
2023-06-25vs RCW - Davis/ThomanWon 31
W#1 DoublesF Taylor Clark / Matt Helsel vs Mark Lewis / Michael Davis6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKenneth Myhre vs Mark Koons6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Garman / Jeffrey Robbins vs Ken Grove / Kirk Thoman2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteven Lubart / William Shambach vs John Briner / Tom Brink1-6, 4-6
2023-06-18vs RCW - Davis/ThomanLost 13
W#1 DoublesKenneth Myhre / Jeffrey Robbins vs Jeff Clark / Ken Grove6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesF Taylor Clark vs Mark Koons4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Ludwig / William Shambach vs Tom Brink / Kirk Thoman3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Garman / Steven Lubart vs Ben Lehman / Mark Lewis2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RCW - Davis/Thoman51141022187
2LVC - Robbins15101432240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Kenneth Myhre
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
David Heinzelmann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.93
Steven Lubart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.72
Hadjh Ahrns
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Jeffrey Robbins
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
F Taylor Clark
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Matt Helsel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Matthew Garman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Matthew Ludwig
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Gallo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
William Shambach
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Ludwig + Kenneth Myhre9257% games+6.8% vs expected
David Heinzelmann + Jeffrey Robbins3252% games+4.7% vs expected
Jeffrey Robbins + Kenneth Myhre13854% games+3.7% vs expected
Matthew Garman + Jeffrey Robbins4352% games−0.9% vs expected
Matthew Garman + David Heinzelmann4349% games−8.9% vs expected
Matthew Garman + Matthew Ludwig2540% gamesnot enough data
Steven Lubart + Matthew Ludwig1540% gamesnot enough data
William Shambach + David Heinzelmann2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenneth Myhre
59W–37L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
David Heinzelmann
103W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.94
4.5
Steven Lubart
17W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.93
Hadjh Ahrns
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Jeffrey Robbins
57W–45L career · 6 lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.45
F Taylor Clark
12W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matt Helsel
14W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Garman
57W–39L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Ludwig
64W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Gallo
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
William Shambach
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.