Teams

Love2Love Tennis

2026 OKCAdult 65 & Over League · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-19vs SpinitinisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMona Moore / Janet Buck vs Chloe Odom / Bonnie Taylor6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJackie Nazim / Amy Miller vs Judy Schornick / Julie Taylor1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Wall / Beverly Bounds vs Sally Beckman / Margaret Knight6-4, 6-2
2026-02-10vs OK/Cantrell-Allen/65&over6.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesMona Moore / Beverly Bounds vs Jeannie Cross / Mari Jones5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRosemary Scherer / Janet Buck vs Christy Cox / Cathy Rowten6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJackie Nazim / LindaFaye Pratt vs Susan Townsend / Sandra Cochran7-5, 3-5, 1-0
2026-02-05vs SpinitinisLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindaFaye Pratt / Gay Harris vs Nancy Anthony / Julie Taylor2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Buck / Rosemary Scherer vs Margaret Knight / Helen Dailey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMona Moore / Beverly Bounds vs Bonnie Taylor / Chloe Odom4-6, 4-5
2026-01-29vs OK/Cantrell-Allen/65&over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackie Nazim / Mona Moore vs Lillian Thee / Jo Smith6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDianne Soltani / Amy Miller vs Mari Jones / Vickie Gorton1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGay Harris / Susan Wall vs Cindy Cantrell / Roxy Castner1-6, 2-6
2026-01-20vs OK/Cantrell-Allen/65&over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesRosemary Scherer / Janet Buck vs Lillian Thee / Jo Smith1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Nazim / Mona Moore vs Susan Townsend / Sandra Cochran5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Wall / Sandi English vs Vickie Gorton / Mari Jones1-6, 4-6
2026-01-15vs SpinitinisWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Buck / Mona Moore vs Vicky MARTIN / Chloe Odom1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLindaFaye Pratt / Gay Harris vs Helen Dailey / Margaret Knight2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Wall / Beverly Bounds vs Dawna Johnston / Bonnie Taylor3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-01-08vs OK/Cantrell-Allen/65&over6.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesMona Moore / Janet Buck vs Mari Jones / Vickie Gorton0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandi English / Susan Wall vs Rachel Zelon / Jeannie Cross6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJackie Nazim / Amy Miller vs Lillian Thee / Cindy Cantrell1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-01-06vs SpinitinisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Wall / Beverly Bounds vs Glenda Radigonda / Judy Schornick3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDianne Soltani / Jackie Nazim vs Carolyn Higganbotham / Chloe Odom6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Cantrell-Allen/65&over6.0W6218615161
2Love2Love Tennis53111333233
3Spinitinis1771736247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Sandi English
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Amy Miller
published 3
2.71
Dianne Soltani
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Beverly Bounds
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.68
Jackie Nazim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Rosemary Scherer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Mona Moore
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.53
Janet Buck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gay Harris
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Helen Swope
published
LindaFaye Pratt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Wall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Yvonne Gammon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mona Moore + Rosemary Scherer6260% games+8.1% vs expected
Dianne Soltani + Helen Swope6457% games+2.7% vs expected
Jackie Nazim + LindaFaye Pratt5551% games−5.7% vs expected
Jackie Nazim + Mona Moore6947% games−6.0% vs expected
Jackie Nazim + Dianne Soltani5349% games−6.3% vs expected
Mona Moore + Janet Buck3338% games−9.3% vs expected
Rosemary Scherer + Janet Buck6747% games−11.5% vs expected
Gay Harris + LindaFaye Pratt5947% games−13.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandi English
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Amy Miller
4W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Dianne Soltani
33W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Beverly Bounds
33W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Jackie Nazim
111W–122L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Rosemary Scherer
43W–49L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
Mona Moore
26W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.60
Janet Buck
48W–74L career · 6 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Gay Harris
20W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Helen Swope
16W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
LindaFaye Pratt
25W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Wall
29W–53L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yvonne Gammon
20W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.