Teams

Alley Cats

ADULT 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-28vs TurnbullWon 20
W#1 DoublesDolores Hoffman / Debra Payne vs Sara Dutch / Kristen Andrews6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMARIA ZUMWALT / Jane Troyer vs Vereleta Saraceno / Katie Turnbull6-4, 6-2
2026-03-28vs TurnbullWon 20
W#2 DoublesJane Troyer / MARIA ZUMWALT vs Sara Dutch / Joyce Thomas2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRose Trapp / Dolores Hoffman vs Anny Prior / Katie Turnbull6-1, 6-3
2026-03-27vs TurnbullLost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Hatch / Debra Payne vs Vereleta Saraceno / Katie Turnbull4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChristine Scharf / Dolores Hoffman vs Joyce Thomas / Sara Dutch3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAudrei Glick / Penny Digby vs Jimmie Ward / Kristen Andrews1-6, 5-7
2026-03-27vs TurnbullWon 21
L#1 DoublesDebra Payne / Dolores Hoffman vs Ursula Winzer-Serhan / Vereleta Saraceno4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Scharf / Lara Miller vs Jimmie Ward / Kristen Andrews6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPenny Digby / Audrei Glick vs Anny Prior / Katie Turnbull6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Penny Digby
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Dolores Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Jane Troyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
MARIA ZUMWALT
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Debra Payne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Christine Scharf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.25
Audrei Glick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lara Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penny Digby + Dolores Hoffman7746% games−2.6% vs expected
Dolores Hoffman + Christine Scharf61048% games−11.8% vs expected
Jane Troyer + MARIA ZUMWALT7748% games−12.2% vs expected
Christine Scharf + MARIA ZUMWALT2746% gamesnot enough data
Dolores Hoffman + Jane Troyer404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Penny Digby
60W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
Dolores Hoffman
65W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Jane Troyer
79W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
MARIA ZUMWALT
58W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Debra Payne
16W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.60
3
Christine Scharf
32W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Audrei Glick
4W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Lara Miller
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.