Teams

RCSP Faraci

2023 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.0 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-10vs Seminole Lake JordanLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristina Faraci / Marti Pyle vs Debra Edwards / Patty Anderson3-6, 2-6
2023-05-20vs Countryside CoyotesWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngela Rashba / Jennifer Seminara vs Cynthia Medvic / Michele Weinstock6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristina Faraci / Marti Pyle vs Elizabeth Tafone / Karen Neal6-2, 6-0
2023-05-13vs Tarpon ColemanWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarti Pyle / Angela Rashba vs Lynn Spies / Paula Kastenson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-12vs Pinellas/Dunn/40&Over3.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaiva di Vito / Angela Rashba vs Kimberly Kurey / Bettie Romer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-05-06vs ELW HueholtLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristina Faraci / Judy Horvath vs Christine Hueholt / Lee Cucchi3-6, 1-6
2023-04-15vs SPTC PruettLost 01
L#1 DoublesBiatta Malkiewicz / Kristina Faraci vs Kelly Bernish / Abby Sterensis1-6, 4-6
2023-04-01vs Tarpon ColemanWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoanna Johns / Marti Pyle vs Patricia Aliak / Gabriela Tanase6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Judy Horvath
published
3.13
Monika Hazners
published
3.04
Biatta Malkiewicz
published 3.5
3.04
Marti Pyle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.03
Angela Rashba
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Kelley Richardsonn
published
2.87
Daiva di Vito
published 3
2.86
Kristina Faraci
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.36
Kathy Wallen
published
Jennifer Seminara
published
Joanna Johns
published
Zhanna Thomas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marti Pyle + Kristina Faraci271855% games−2.6% vs expected
Kristina Faraci + Angela Rashba5359% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judy Horvath
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Monika Hazners
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Biatta Malkiewicz
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Marti Pyle
54W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Angela Rashba
39W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.03
Kelley Richardsonn
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Daiva di Vito
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Kristina Faraci
73W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
Kathy Wallen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%86%14%
2.36
Jennifer Seminara
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joanna Johns
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Zhanna Thomas
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.