Teams

SATL18/Patterson/YMCA

USTA Combo 18 & Over · Men - 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-01vs SATL18C/DTroxell/BeechSpringsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Feig / Sean Tario vs Patrick Ratigan / Pradeep Reddy6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJason Patterson / Terry Smith vs Chockalingam Ravindran / Prakash Bathini6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChris Ollinger / Jason Nix vs Luke Hammond / Jagan Ambati4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-18Won 30
W#1 DoublesAlexander Meek / Jason Nix vs Josh Martin / Hatcher Geary7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJason Patterson / David Bowen vs Kevin Hampton / Blake Hooks6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChris Ollinger / Sean Tario vs Justin Brown / Andrew Martin6-1, 6-0
2026-08-17vs SATL18C/DTroxell/BeechSpringsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJason Patterson / Sean Tario vs Chockalingam Ravindran / Prakash Bathini6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDaniel Feig / Fred BRUTSKY vs Patrick Ratigan / Jagan Ambati5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRon Moore / Jason Nix vs Paul Sap / Andres Garcia-Hood5-0
2026-08-16Won 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Feig / David Bowen vs Hatcher Geary / David White6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJason Patterson / Michael Mains vs Josh Martin / Justin Brown4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChris Ollinger / Fred BRUTSKY vs Blake Hooks / Kevin Hampton6-1, 6-1
2026-07-21vs SATL18C/DTroxell/BeechSpringsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlexander Meek / Sean Tario vs Luke Hammond / Jagan Ambati6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJason Patterson / Fred BRUTSKY vs Paul Sap / Dan Troxell6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRon Moore / Jason Nix vs Chockalingam Ravindran / Prakash Bathini3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATL18/Patterson/YMCA3072454
2SATL18C/DTroxell/BeechSprings1133649
3SATL18/JMartin/GHS032715103

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Daniel Feig
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Chris Ollinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Jason Patterson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.36
Sean Tario
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Alexander Meek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Ron Moore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Fred BRUTSKY
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Jason Nix
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Gregory Whitley
published 3
2.51
Michael Mains
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Ollinger + Jason Patterson033 matchesnot enough data
Chris Ollinger + Daniel Feig303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Feig
27W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Chris Ollinger
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Jason Patterson
37W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.38
Sean Tario
30W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
3.5
Alexander Meek
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Ron Moore
26W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Fred BRUTSKY
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Jason Nix
19W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Gregory Whitley
11W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Mains
5W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.