Teams

Br.Humphrey18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-29vs Je.Komes18C6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesSabrina Fink / Cara Mathers vs Bladen Leippe / Amanda Mueller7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSara Lilley / Catherine Wilborne vs Alison Sinclair / Keshia Green4-6, 4-6
2025-09-22vs Ma.Cambo18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesCara Mathers / Meimei Wessinger vs Nicole Dolan / Aulia Tandradinata6-2, 6-4
2025-09-15vs Er.Wynia18C6.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca O'Brien / Mary Long vs Karen Johnston / Tracy Lowrance5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCara Mathers / Meimei Wessinger vs Kendra Allen / Megan Kimsey6-4, 6-3
2025-09-08vs Ca.Grimes18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaggie Finney / Meimei Wessinger vs Jerri Lemanski / Rachel Pisciotta4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSabrina Fink / Mary Long vs Rebecca Anderson / Leigh Stallings6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-25vs Ki.Lamm18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca O'Brien / Mary Long vs Annie Flowers / Lori Jensen6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSara Lilley / Catherine Wilborne vs Alicia Fitzsimmons / Kimberly Lamm6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-18vs Sh.Littleton18CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaggie Finney / Meimei Wessinger vs Julie Dougherty / Suzanne Braga7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRebecca O'Brien / Mary Long vs Vanese Clough / Laurel Saunders5-7, 1-6
2025-08-11vs Co.Haynes18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesSara Lilley / Catherine Wilborne vs Michelle Gessner / Connie Haynes6-4, 6-1
2025-08-04vs Ka.Barsness18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeimei Wessinger / Cara Mathers vs Allison McCartney / Bryan Kern6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLogan Adkins / Catherine Wilborne vs Kathy Garnier / Stephanie Suski2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Cara Mathers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Logan Adkins
published
3.46
Meimei Wessinger
published
3.32
Sara Lilley
published
3.24
Maggie Finney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Rebecca O'Brien
published
3.10
Juliana Treleven
published
2.96
Mary Long
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Catherine Wilborne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
2.56
Sabrina Fink
published
Liz Wansley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Finney + Cara Mathers5256% games+9.3% vs expected
Mary Long + Rebecca O'Brien12755% games+6.0% vs expected
Mary Long + Maggie Finney213 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Humphrey + Juliana Treleven123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cara Mathers
37W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Logan Adkins
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Meimei Wessinger
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Sara Lilley
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Maggie Finney
34W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Rebecca O'Brien
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Juliana Treleven
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Mary Long
45W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Catherine Wilborne
57W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Brittany Humphrey
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
Sabrina Fink
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Liz Wansley
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.