Teams

BCC Eubank

2025 Lynchburg Tri-level · Lynchburg Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-19vs RC HooverWon 21
L#1 DoublesAllison Ebert / Becky Giles vs Anna Aldridge / Lisa Hoover2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Eubank / Stacey Basten vs Kendra Turner / Allison Rakos6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Hellewell / Ellen Steed vs amy Shrock / Emmerson Colasanto6-3, 6-4
2025-09-10vs OCC BradleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Knight / Kelsi Justice vs Rachel Love / Maria Roberts6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWhitney Perrow / Gretchen Perkins vs Deborah Benton / Fran Inge6-2, 3-0
W#3 DoublesJulia White / Ellen Steed vs Justine Button / Tracey Langseth6-4, 6-4
2025-08-18vs RC HooverWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelsi Justice / Kelly Knight vs Cecilia Robinson / Lisa Hoover6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStacey Basten / Lory Sibcy vs Pascale Renald / Kendra Turner6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Lawson / Lalla Johnson vs Emmerson Colasanto / Amy Dietrich3-6, 4-6
2025-08-14vs OCC BradleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelsi Justice / Becky Giles vs Rachel Love / Grace Petty6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLory Sibcy / Sherri Meyer vs Deborah Benton / Elizabeth Bogle5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Steed / Sarah Hellewell vs Justine Button / Amanda Smithson4-6, 5-7
2025-07-30vs OCC BradleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelsi Justice / Kelly Knight vs Kersten Morrison / Maria Roberts6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLory Sibcy / Whitney Perrow vs Fran Inge / Elizabeth Bogle7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Lawson / Julia White vs Kate Naples / Verna Guanzon6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lynchburg Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Kelsi Justice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Kelly Knight
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Whitney Perrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Lory Sibcy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Allison Ebert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Gretchen Perkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Lynn Will
published
3.54
Becky Giles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Stacey Basten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Denise Eubank
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Sherri Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Julia White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Catherine Lawson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.14
Ellen Steed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Kate Tinsley
published
2.83
Sarah Hellewell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Lalla Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelsi Justice + Kelly Knight6073% games+15.0% vs expected
Ellen Steed + Julia White404 matchesnot enough data
Denise Eubank + Stacey Basten213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelsi Justice
20W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
4.15
Kelly Knight
21W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Whitney Perrow
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Lory Sibcy
17W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Allison Ebert
4W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
Gretchen Perkins
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.67
Lynn Will
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Becky Giles
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Stacey Basten
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Denise Eubank
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Sherri Meyer
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Julia White
14W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
3
Catherine Lawson
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Ellen Steed
21W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Kate Tinsley
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.13
Sarah Hellewell
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Lalla Johnson
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.