Teams

LHammond

2022 Capital Fall 18 & Over Singles League · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-06vs AGranthamLost 12
L#1 SinglesShannon Aumer vs Kristin Blankenhorn Tharpe0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle Metelo vs Kristine Potter0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesRossana Prevost vs Ashley Grantham4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-09-29vs LMcReeLost 02
L#2 SinglesShannon Aumer vs Rossi Evans0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMichelle Metelo vs Emily Andino2-6, 3-6
2022-09-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesMiriam Waters vs Teri Jimenez6-2, 6-3
2022-09-15Split 11
L#2 SinglesShannon Aumer vs Melissa Burke2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesRossana Prevost vs Jennifer Albritton6-1, 4-6
2022-09-01vs JKomesLost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriam Waters vs Jeannette Brown6-7, 3-6
2022-08-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesMiriam Waters vs Sue Koehler7-6, 6-3
2022-08-18vs KLevineLost 03
L#1 SinglesShannon Aumer vs Elizabeth Carroll0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle Metelo vs Kristen Levine3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRossana Prevost vs Beth Farrell1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Melissa Weber
published
2.76
Rossana Prevost
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.61
Michelle Metelo
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.53
Miriam Waters
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.44
Bridget Whalen
published 3
2.25
Lisa Hammond
published
2.17
Shannon Aumer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miriam Waters + Michelle Metelo6849% games+5.0% vs expected
Miriam Waters + Rossana Prevost4161% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Metelo + Shannon Aumer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Weber
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Rossana Prevost
54W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Michelle Metelo
62W–84L career · 3 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
2.61
2.5
Miriam Waters
70W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%42%58%
2.53
3
Bridget Whalen
4W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44
Lisa Hammond
8W–22L career · no lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Shannon Aumer
27W–93L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.