Teams

New 2.5 Thursday PM team

2025 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-14vs LMCA - Cassidy/EdgemoorLost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Gaio / Patty Reich vs Sarah Lashley / Sarah Teague1-1
2025-05-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesLindsey Haberman / Patty Reich vs Maryellen Fay / Bridgett Simmer6-4, 6-0
2025-04-17vs LISI-Siler/JettonWon 10
W#2 DoublesDoga Karyaldiz / Jill Gaio vs Stacy Swaney / Amy Froemming6-1, 6-2
2025-04-03vs LSLE - LeRette/River RunWon 10
W#1 DoublesJan Aurand / Doga Karyaldiz vs Stephanie LeRette / Lisa Baker7-5, 7-5
2025-03-27vs LEPIPickens/JettonLost 02
L#1 DoublesConlyn Zogzas / Jill Gaio vs Stephanie Vaughn / Christian Bowman2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTalia Shelton / Jan Aurand vs Hailey Foreman / Kaitlin Maurer1-6, 1-6
2025-03-20vs LAGR-Grimes/JettonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Gaio / Doga Karyaldiz vs Akilah Grimes / Katheryn White6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-13vs LMCA - Cassidy/EdgemoorLost 02
L#1 DoublesConlyn Zogzas / Doga Karyaldiz vs Michelle Cassidy / Melissa Marlowe4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatty Reich / Lindsey Haberman vs Sally Vacca / Sarah Lashley5-7, 1-6
2025-03-06vs LDTU-TurnerSchoenrock/WestportSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJill Gaio / Patty Reich vs Hanna Schoenrock / Amy Kotek0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDoga Karyaldiz / Conlyn Zogzas vs Michelle Schmerge / Maryellen Fay6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Lindsey Haberman
published
2.43
Dayna Celcev
published 2.5
2.40
Doga Karyaldiz
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Conlyn Zogzas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Patty Reich
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.17
Jan Aurand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Jill Gaio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Talia Shelton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsey Haberman
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Dayna Celcev
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.43
2.5
Doga Karyaldiz
23W–38L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Conlyn Zogzas
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Patty Reich
13W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
Jan Aurand
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Jill Gaio
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Talia Shelton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.