Teams

Courville-CCC

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall · Women 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.36 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-17vs Averett/Jones-GISplit 22
W#1 DoublesLisa Neal / Merett Alexander vs Nikki Ruark / Paige Dudley6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTracy Dean / Polly Fowler vs Lynn Averett / Shannon Galligan1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSelwyn Kelley / Cynthia Hofstetter vs Lori Turner / Virginia Lawrence3-6, 0-6
W#4 DoublesCortney Douglas / Nellie Frields vs Michelle Jones / Allison Scarbrough6-1, 7-5
2024-11-10vs Brown/Johnson-CCLost 14
L#1 DoublesCrystal Trawick / Nellie Frields vs Andresa Brown / Pearlie Jenkins2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesPolly Fowler vs Jenny Savage5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Hofstetter / Cortney Douglas vs Carmita Duke / Malgorzata Zezula Gayler4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTraci Courville / Allison Coleman vs Canita Johnson / Luz Eaton6-1, 6-0
L#4 DoublesAminta Flowers / Merett Alexander vs Carolyn Erkins / Lisa Dupree6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-30vs Galbraith/Culpepper-GILost 14
L#1 DoublesLloyd Pease / Allison Coleman vs Sherry Bunn / Elizabeth Borom6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLindsay Mclaurin vs Susan Culpepper7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTraci Courville / Carson de Mars vs Lisa Galbraith / Sue Goldman4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNellie Frields / Crystal Trawick vs Robin Snipes / Rena Wilson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesSelwyn Kelley / Tracy Dean vs Amy Streeton / Rashmi Hudson2-6, 2-6
2024-10-27vs Ezell-CCLost 14
L#1 DoublesCrystal Trawick / Nellie Frields vs Jeaneen Thompson / Pam Knight4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesPolly Fowler vs Alicia Werle6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracy Dean / Cynthia Hofstetter vs Melissa Foy / Wanda Morpeth1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTraci Courville / Carson de Mars vs Paige King / Kelly Cliett1-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesCortney Douglas / Aminta Flowers vs Sheila Ezell / Tracey Stribling2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charisse Hill
published 3.5
Crystal Trawick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Allison Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Polly Fowler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Merett Alexander
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Carson de Mars
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.94
Lisa Neal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Lloyd Pease
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Tracy Dean
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Nellie Frields
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Lindsay Mclaurin
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
Aminta Flowers
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Traci Courville
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Cortney Douglas
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Cynthia Hofstetter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.53
Gena Stone
published
2.41
Selwyn Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Hofstetter + Cortney Douglas2443% games+4.8% vs expected
Crystal Trawick + Nellie Frields2446% games−4.9% vs expected
Lloyd Pease + Allison Coleman6948% games−13.7% vs expected
Cynthia Hofstetter + Tracy Dean1533% gamesnot enough data
Carson de Mars + Tracy Dean1439% gamesnot enough data
Gena Stone + Selwyn Kelley213 matchesnot enough data
Merett Alexander + Tracy Dean213 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Hofstetter + Nellie Frields033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charisse Hill
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Crystal Trawick
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Allison Coleman
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Polly Fowler
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Merett Alexander
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Carson de Mars
17W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Lisa Neal
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Lloyd Pease
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
Tracy Dean
13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Nellie Frields
6W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.79
Lindsay Mclaurin
21W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Aminta Flowers
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Traci Courville
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.63
3
Cortney Douglas
20W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
3.5
Cynthia Hofstetter
3W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.57
Gena Stone
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%42%58%
2.53
Selwyn Kelley
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.