Teams

Kiwi - Carlson

2025 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.62 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-01vs EFSC - ArcherWon 30
W#1 DoublesDanielle Carlson / Katey Benne vs Daniella Archer / Tammy Bertolini6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Sexton / Heather Taylor vs Karen Nierenberg / Brianna Stevens6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMikayla Lewin / Emily Burke vs Calli Ohlin / Mackenzie Sloan6-1, 6-4
2025-09-21vs Brevard/Vickers/Combo18&Over5.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesDanielle Carlson / Anne Burns vs Melissa Vickers / Brenda Tarquinio0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSummer Moses / Emily Burke vs Stephanie Lasko / Lindsay Nichols0-6, 2-6
2025-08-27vs EFSC - ArcherLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Carlson / Summer Moses vs Cheryl Toth / Alix Amozig1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Burns / Tera Schroeder vs Daniella Archer / Tammy Bertolini6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatey Benne / Lisa Sexton vs Brianna Stevens / Calli Ohlin6-2, 6-2
2025-08-13vs Brevard/Vickers/Combo18&Over5.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanielle Carlson / Anne Burns vs Melissa Vickers / Lael Woods2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSummer Moses / Heather Taylor vs Brenda Tarquinio / Maryanne Donigan1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElise Johnson / Emily Burke vs Stephanie Lasko / Lindsay Nichols3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Heather Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Danielle Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Anne Burns
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.26
Lisa Sexton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.19
Katey Benne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.96
Emily Burke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Mikayla Lewin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Summer Moses
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tera Schroeder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Sexton + Anne Burns044 matchesnot enough data
Emily Burke + Summer Moses123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Heather Taylor
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
2.5
Danielle Carlson
12W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%45%55%
2.52
2.5
Anne Burns
10W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
Lisa Sexton
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
Katey Benne
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Emily Burke
5W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Mikayla Lewin
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Summer Moses
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tera Schroeder
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.