Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM
2026 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 40 & Over Women
14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA
Schedule5 played
i
Flight standings15 teams · 7.5 40 & Over Women
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Abraham 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM | 2 | 0 | 3 | 47 |
| 2Bettinger/Kraska 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM | 2 | 0 | 4 | 48 |
| 3Kirby 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| 4Moore/Roach 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| 5Goy 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PM | 1 | 0 | 2 | 16 |
| 6Dean 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM | 1 | 0 | 4 | 29 |
| 7Weeks 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM | 1 | 1 | 7 | 50 |
| 8Baker 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM | 1 | 1 | 7 | 62 |
| 9Satterfield/Goodman 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10Joplin/Flanagan 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM | 0 | 1 | 5 | 31 |
| 11Taylor/Andree 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM | 0 | 1 | 5 | 36 |
| 12Brown 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM | 0 | 1 | 6 | 37 |
| 13Beck 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM | 0 | 1 | 6 | 37 |
| 14Reynolds/Mohorn 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM | 0 | 2 | 10 | 72 |
| 15Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM | 0 | 2 | 11 | 72 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Natalie Harris + Cassidy MacKay | 11–2 | 67% games | +12.4% vs expected |
| Jennifer Dymek + Donna Warrick | 5–3 | 57% games | +11.2% vs expected |
| Deanna Rouse + Jennifer Dymek | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Natalie Harris + Allison Walsh | 3–1 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Allison Walsh + Karen Robinson | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Pamela Rosendale + Natalie Harris | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Brandy Gillenwater + Karen Robinson | 2–1 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.