Teams

LWR Zeigler

2023 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter · 8.0 W Thursday

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-09vs Sarasota National DuncanWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheila Perry / Kim Eck vs Ana Areosa / Carla Rodman6-1, 6-2
2023-03-02vs River Strand QuirosWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheila Perry / Kim Eck vs Valerie Grubbs / Judi Wilson6-0, 6-3
2023-02-09vs Cedars BockSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKim Eck / Barbara Cogen vs Wendy Hillock / Cherie Lopez0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBetty Jo Zeigler / Diana Stadelnikas vs Lisa Simotes / Alison White6-4, 6-3
2023-02-02vs Mission Valley GibbsWon 10
W#2 DoublesBetty Jo Zeigler / Diana Stadelnikas vs HelenAnne Quigley / Beatriz Orive6-2, 6-3
2023-01-26vs LBK Club LidskyWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Kim Eck vs Linda Gillott / Sue Campbell6-2, 6-1
2023-01-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesBetty Jo Zeigler / Diana Stadelnikas vs Elaine Jessop / Ute Vela-Marquez6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2023-01-12vs LWR SosaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSheila Perry / Kim Eck vs Kerstin Hylen-Sundstrom / Nanelle Rosales4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Victoria Reid vs Carol Kloeppel / Bernadette Waterman3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Kim Eck
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.70
Diana Stadelnikas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Karen Nicholson
published
3.69
Sheila Perry
published
3.66
Betty Jo Zeigler
published 4
3.62
Victoria Reid
published
3.61
Barbara Cogen
published 4
3.42
Marcia Frost
published
Karen O'Brien
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Stadelnikas + Kim Eck3352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kim Eck
56W–31L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Diana Stadelnikas
106W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Karen Nicholson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Sheila Perry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Betty Jo Zeigler
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
Victoria Reid
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Barbara Cogen
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Marcia Frost
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.42
Karen O'Brien
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.