Teams

Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-29vs DCC/Slaven W3.5FWon 31
W#1 DoublesErin Copley / Julie Gasch vs Jordan Hunt / Brittany Miller1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKelly Turco vs Nellie Dunn6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Beth Duffy / Rachel Cutshaw vs Molly Fernandes / Jessica Slaven6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEmily Cox / Pressley Peters vs Daley Bennett / Jennifer Cardwell6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-10-10vs High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5FSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCourtney Gilbert / Lindsay Mayer vs Tricia Ehrisman / Deganit Gal6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesErin Copley vs Tara Glotzbach6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Wallace / Mandy Evans vs MARNI WISE - ITSCOVITCH / Kirsten Kirlin1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Peticolas / Mary Yang vs Mary Tucker / Chelsea Northam0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-10-03vs Rockwall GAC/Lucas W3.5FWon 31
W#1 DoublesFran Matise / Kelly Turco vs Lynn Farrow / Hayley Hill7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Cox vs Anya Preece1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Benson / Kerri Scott vs Elaine Kelley / Mindy Lucas6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErin Copley / Mandy Evans vs Chrissy Edwards / Linda Trahan6-2, 7-5
2025-09-19vs Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujedzsky W3.5FWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelley Green / Kerri Scott vs Allison Singleton / Mary Ann Walters6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesErin Copley vs Heather Williams6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJulie Gasch / Melissa Peticolas vs Heidi Aiken / Kim Holford2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJanice van Arsdale / Emily Seifert vs Julie Sayah / Kelly Oujezdsky6-1, 6-2
2025-09-05vs Lakewood/Cook W3.5FWon 40
W#1 DoublesKelly Turco / Amy Benson vs Kristi Bare / Melinda Kurzner6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRachel Cutshaw vs Claudia Magee6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanice van Arsdale / Kelley Green vs Jennifer Campiti / Jenny Fife6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPressley Peters / Amber Carter vs Jen Adams / Lynn Robertson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Kelley Green
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Kelly Turco
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.48
Fran Matise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Janice van Arsdale
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Kerri Scott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Julie Gasch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Rachel Cutshaw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.31
Courtney Gilbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Erin Copley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Melissa Peticolas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Mary Yang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Mary Beth Duffy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Lindsay Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Pressley Peters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Emily Cox
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Emily Seifert
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Lisa Wallace
published
Mandy Evans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fran Matise + Janice van Arsdale404 matchesnot enough data
Kerri Scott + Kelley Green303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelley Green
20W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Kelly Turco
9W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Fran Matise
15W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Janice van Arsdale
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Kerri Scott
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Julie Gasch
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Rachel Cutshaw
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Courtney Gilbert
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Erin Copley
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Melissa Peticolas
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Mary Yang
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Mary Beth Duffy
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Lindsay Mayer
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Pressley Peters
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Emily Cox
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Emily Seifert
11W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Wallace
12W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mandy Evans
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.