Teams

KY/LEX/Lundy

2022 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 4.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.79 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Kylie Russ
published
4.01
Laurie Larkin
published
3.85
Carrie Striker
published 4
3.84
Janna Francisco
published
3.83
Anne Faulconer
published 4
3.77
Lisa Combs
published
3.73
Ileana Contreras
published 4
3.70
Leslie Stone
published
3.65
Leslie Russ
published
3.65
Sandra Wickline
published
3.58
Emily J Whitnell
published 4
3.45
Nicole Norfleet
published
3.25
Billie Walters
published 3.5
Brooks Lundy
published 3.5
3.14
Cristi Hundley
published 3.5
Katerina Molina
published
MegAnn Leigh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Faulconer + Laurie Larkin11166% games+7.5% vs expected
Leslie Russ + Kylie Russ12266% games+5.8% vs expected
Leslie Stone + Sandra Wickline4163% games−6.4% vs expected
Jennifer Scutchfield + Anne Faulconer314 matchesnot enough data
Anne Faulconer + Lisa Combs044 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Russ + Billie Walters134 matchesnot enough data
Katerina Molina + Nicole Norfleet123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kylie Russ
45W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
4.04
Laurie Larkin
91W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Carrie Striker
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Janna Francisco
21W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Anne Faulconer
45W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.83
Lisa Combs
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ileana Contreras
45W–25L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Leslie Stone
26W–11L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Leslie Russ
39W–31L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Sandra Wickline
30W–16L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Emily J Whitnell
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Nicole Norfleet
25W–49L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Billie Walters
13W–26L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Brooks Lundy
3W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cristi Hundley
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
Jennifer Scutchfield
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Katerina Molina
25W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
MegAnn Leigh
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.