Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Balch

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0M

8 players · average NTRP 2.80 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-25vs Sports Mall-McBroomLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrian Sheets / J David Nelson vs David Seaman / Don McBroom0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Riches / David Leta vs Ronald Zimmerman / Frank Spracklen1-6, 2-6
2024-09-04vs Sports Mall-McBroomSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlfred Balch / Ryan Riches vs Ronald Zimmerman / Frank Spracklen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Sheets / Michael Christensen vs Don McBroom / Randy Fox6-3, 7-5
2024-08-14vs Sports Mall-McBroomLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlfred Balch / Clark Layton vs Chris Boyack / Ronald Zimmerman4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDavid Leta / J David Nelson vs Brent Butcher / Don McBroom1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Janzen / Brian Sheets vs Martin Kern / Tom Pinborough6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Sheets
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Clark Layton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Alfred Balch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.46
David Leta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.40
Robert Janzen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.07
Larry Richie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
J David Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Riches
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alfred Balch + Clark Layton01036% games+1.5% vs expected
Robert Janzen + J David Nelson01025% games−12.9% vs expected
Alfred Balch + J David Nelson3348% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Riches + Larry Richie1534% gamesnot enough data
Alfred Balch + Ryan Riches044 matchesnot enough data
Alfred Balch + Robert Janzen134 matchesnot enough data
Alfred Balch + Brian Sheets044 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Riches + Clark Layton044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brian Sheets
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Clark Layton
13W–38L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Alfred Balch
51W–204L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%57%43%
2.48
3
David Leta
6W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.46
Robert Janzen
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Larry Richie
39W–119L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07
J David Nelson
3W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Riches
13W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.