Teams

Coming In Hot

2026 Summer Smash Doubles · Womens 3.0

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-06-14vs Hit HappensWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Brown / Chapel Davis vs Lanie Bumgarner / anna suddreth6-2, 6-1
2026-06-11vs Served HotLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlicia Brown / Chapel Davis vs Chloee Dula / Michelle Huffman1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Womens 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Served Hot202005
2Diamonds In The Rough2020116
3Coming In Hot1111215
4Thomas/RB/Foothills1212537
5Hit Happens05051059

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Chapel Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Sharon Taylor
published
2.64
Alicia Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Taylor + Alicia Brown2538% games−7.4% vs expected
Alicia Brown + Chapel Davis224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chapel Davis
87W–97L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Sharon Taylor
8W–11L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Alicia Brown
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.