Teams

SLTVA-Vallejos edgemore

Lake USTA 40 & Over Summer Singles · 3.5 Men Sat AM 40+ Singles

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 SinglesSal Zammitti vs Matt Nietupski1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSeung Min Hyun vs Charles Boehly5-7, 5-7
L#3 SinglesTrevor Groff vs Stephen Phillips0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTimothy Vallejos vs Kurt Lueck1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWilliam Wingo vs David Andrews4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesSeung Min Hyun vs Steve Nuhfer6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesWilliam Wingo vs Matt Nietupski4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesHyo Rhee vs Jason Belnick7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSeung Min Hyun vs Dale Peterson6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesWilliam Wingo vs Stephen Phillips6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSeung Min Hyun vs Charles Boehly3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesHyo Rhee vs Scott Robinson6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesWilliam Wingo vs Stephen Phillips6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSal Zammitti vs David Andrews3-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesTimothy Vallejos vs Charles Boehly4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesSeung Min Hyun vs Kurt Lueck6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesTimothy Vallejos vs Jason Belnick1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Wingo vs Kurt Lueck3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDan Reinhart vs Matt Nietupski1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTrevor Groff vs Jason Belnick1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Men Sat AM 40+ Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SLJBE-Belnick WESTPORT M 40+ 3.5 Singles Sat4313819177
2SLTVA-Vallejos edgemore3481328204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Hyo Rhee
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Seung Min Hyun
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Dan Reinhart
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
William Wingo
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.21
Sal Zammitti
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.10
Timothy Vallejos
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Trevor Groff
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Reinhart + Timothy Vallejos5547% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hyo Rhee
118W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Seung Min Hyun
37W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Dan Reinhart
63W–77L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
William Wingo
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Sal Zammitti
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Timothy Vallejos
84W–144L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Trevor Groff
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.