Teams

Reiling-Stout 18s ES Fall ‘24

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 WOMEN

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-11vs Hobbs/Anderson Early StartLost 01
L#1 DoublesKerry Reiling / Lynda Stout vs Kimberly Mueller / Rita McDonald2-6, 1-6
2024-12-03vs Allex 4.0 ES 2025Won 10
W#2 DoublesKerry Reiling / Jan Harris vs Tori Rieves / Emily Held6-3, 6-2
2024-11-19vs BaerenwaldES2024Won 41
W#1 DoublesLynda Stout / Andrea Boado vs Julie Bowles / Claire Townsend6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMegan Bradley vs Kelly Keegan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesErika Skanse / Martha Shannon vs Lorraine Hulbert / Megan Murray-Bennett6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMartha Ginder vs Marlo Haugen6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJan Harris / Patty Barr vs Sara DeSanto / Jennifer Jorgenson6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesMartha Shannon / Erika Skanse vs Lydia Crouser / Kristin Nesseth4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMelissa Uppgren vs Betsy Sedlak6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMartha Ginder / Lynda Stout vs Susan Gherity / Lynne Kaufman6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMegan Bradley vs Killeen Wareham6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRory Osberg / Jennifer Magnuson vs Shelley Wagener / Jennifer Johnson6-4, 7-5
2024-11-05vs Ouyang/Pjevach 18+ ES 2025Won 32
W#1 DoublesErika Skanse / Lynda Stout vs Carol Steiger / Megan Wrobel6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Bradley vs Marcela Palavecino5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMartha Shannon / Patty Barr vs Barbara Pjevach / Katherine Pjevach4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMartha Ginder vs Michelle Finlon6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKara Pederson / Sara Hong vs Stacey Douville / Amy Biewen6-3, 6-0
2024-10-29vs Cammack 2025 Early StartLost 01
L#3 DoublesKerry Reiling / Johanna Gennrich vs Donna Sommerfeldt / Rebecca Cantwell2-6, 4-6
2024-10-15vs Toleu: 4.0ever YoungLost 01
L#1 DoublesKerry Reiling / Lynda Stout vs Michelle Finley / Sarah Johnson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Melissa Uppgren
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.95
Martha Ginder
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.92
Megan Bradley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.90
Kara Pederson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Kerry Reiling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.87
Norma Wolk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Lynda Stout
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Carol Schmelz
published 4
3.84
Jan Harris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Jennifer Magnuson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Sarah Twedt
published
3.81
Rory Osberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Patty Barr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Erika Skanse
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Andrea Boado
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.67
Sara Hong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Johanna Gennrich
published
3.58
Martha Shannon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Boado + Lynda Stout4263% games+14.3% vs expected
Patty Barr + Kara Pederson5163% games+6.8% vs expected
Sara Hong + Kara Pederson5256% games−3.0% vs expected
Carol Schmelz + Erika Skanse8851% games−8.1% vs expected
Jan Harris + Lynda Stout224 matchesnot enough data
Carol Schmelz + Melissa Uppgren404 matchesnot enough data
Martha Shannon + Patty Barr134 matchesnot enough data
Martha Shannon + Erika Skanse224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Uppgren
32W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
Martha Ginder
54W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.95
Megan Bradley
27W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Kara Pederson
31W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Kerry Reiling
252W–157L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
Norma Wolk
50W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Lynda Stout
55W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Carol Schmelz
31W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
Jan Harris
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Jennifer Magnuson
27W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
Sarah Twedt
33W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
Rory Osberg
46W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Patty Barr
28W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Erika Skanse
27W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Andrea Boado
60W–43L career · 9 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Sara Hong
33W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Johanna Gennrich
15W–26L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.62
Martha Shannon
25W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.