Teams

Crowder/NLR/Lakewood

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-01-25vs Herbert/Sheridan/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesLeah Welker vs Karla Karwoski6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRegina Maher vs Marda Isbell6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesBriana Crowder vs Sara Jennings6-1, 6-1
2024-12-19vs Laureano/NLR/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesSarah Rech vs Florencia Bruzatori6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMargaret Jackson vs Joyce Adame7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLeah Welker vs Chanda Price6-1, 6-2
2024-12-17vs Miller/LR/BPWon 21
L#1 SinglesLeah Welker vs Jasmine Black3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCamille Davis vs Jennifer O Kelley4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBriana Crowder vs Martina Davis6-1, 6-1
2024-12-11vs Adkins/LR/PVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesRegina Maher vs Evans Lee6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSarah Rech vs Stefan Jones6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJessica Leach vs Jessica Doose0-6, 2-6
2024-11-21vs Virden/LR/RebWon 30
W#1 SinglesBriana Crowder vs Constance Lovelace6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLeah Welker vs Anna Griffiths6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesRegina Maher vs Hayley Hackett6-0, 6-0
2024-11-11vs Bledsoe/LR/PVCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesRegina Maher vs Sommer Ballard6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSarah Rech vs Annie Hogate6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBriana Crowder vs Heidi Brandt6-1, 6-0
2024-10-28vs Rutledge/LR/RebWon 30
W#1 SinglesRegina Maher vs Nathalie Pineda6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMargaret Jackson vs Mallory Floyd6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLeah Welker vs Lisa Hunt6-2, 6-2
2024-10-24vs Anthony/LR/CCLRWon 21
L#1 SinglesLeah Welker vs Mary Nell McBryde2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBriana Crowder vs Lauren Chandler6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSarah Rech vs Rachel Sims6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Regina Maher
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
Briana Crowder
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 43% · published 3
2.68
Leah Welker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.59
Camille Davis
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.45
Jessica Leach
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Margaret Jackson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Sarah Rech
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #3 Singles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Welker + Regina Maher4163% games+24.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Regina Maher
51W–25L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Briana Crowder
6W–7L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leah Welker
29W–27L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Camille Davis
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
Jessica Leach
10W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.45
Margaret Jackson
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Rech
9W–22L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.