Teams

1-GLoFrese-Eno 3.0 18

2022 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-30vs 6-CIrish - SVCWon 20
W#1 SinglesKimberly Donica vs Laura Caldwell2-4
W#2 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Alison Moseley6-0, 6-1
2022-07-19vs 10-NWatts-EnoWon 20
W#2 SinglesCourtney Carey vs Megan McCullough6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesGretchen LoFrese vs Amy Peters6-0, 6-0
2022-07-12vs 5-MLong-ENO-18 3.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesKimberly Donica vs Megan Chiles6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Lisa Montague4-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesCourtney Carey vs Beth Angle6-0, 6-4
2022-07-11vs 9-SNysewander-EnoWon 10
W#3 SinglesGretchen LoFrese vs Kristin Isaacs7-5, 6-3
2022-06-28vs 4-LDubois-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Caroline Perkinson6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesCourtney Carey vs Alexa Hartenstein6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-21vs 8-MFulton-UNCWon 10
W#1 SinglesKimberly Donica vs Erin Berliner6-1, 6-0
2022-06-14vs 3-KLAAN-Eno-18+Split 11
W#1 SinglesKimberly Donica vs Elizabeth Chan6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Berna Tareen2-6, 4-6
2022-06-07vs 7-JDeConto/LWilliams-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesKimberly Donica vs Katie Masood6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Angela Davis6-0, 6-3
2022-05-31vs 2-KGreen-EnoLost 01
L#3 SinglesGretchen LoFrese vs Stephanie Pucci1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Laurie Straube
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.48
Sarah Franks
published
3.38
Wendy Lindberg
published
3.34
Kimberly Donica
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
2.92
Gretchen LoFrese
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.72
Courtney Carey
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Donica + Laurie Straube5461% games+10.7% vs expected
Sarah Franks + Laurie Straube7252% games+0.5% vs expected
Gretchen LoFrese + Kimberly Donica8451% games−0.9% vs expected
Courtney Carey + Gretchen LoFrese11758% gamesnot enough data
Courtney Carey + Kimberly Donica404 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Carey + Laurie Straube213 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Lindberg + Laurie Straube213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Laurie Straube
170W–122L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.51
Sarah Franks
79W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
Wendy Lindberg
42W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Kimberly Donica
148W–51L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
3
Gretchen LoFrese
223W–139L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Courtney Carey
188W–154L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.