Teams

Kennamer

2026 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2025- HSV · 3.5 WOMEN 40N1S3D

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-18vs PerezLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Smith / Joy Watson vs Melinda Anderson / Lori Tillery3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLynne Reynolds / Beth Bryant vs Brenda Perez / Ryan Cate Gibson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Roth / Jill Murray vs Melissa Jose / Karen Zecher0-6, 1-6
2025-10-27vs Newberry/WisnerLost 13
L#1 DoublesKimberley Loomis / Kathy Smith vs Chris Jackson / Donna McDaniel3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCristin Liveoak vs Pam Deerman3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Bryant / Jennifer Pease vs Irene Wisner / Tamera Balch0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKacy Hawkins / Jill Murray vs Mary Smeal / Pamela Keller6-1, 6-2
2025-10-20vs Green 3.5 FallLost 12
L#1 DoublesPhilippa Bianca / Beth Bryant vs Jennifer McCain / Marianna Wester3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCristin Liveoak / Joy Watson vs Julia Godfrey / Cristy Presson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Roth / Shari Moxley vs Leslie Cooper / Nancy West3-6, 4-6
2025-10-18vs Creager 3.5 40+ NIGHT - FallWon 31
W#1 DoublesPhilippa Bianca / Jill Murray vs Patty Laughlin / Michelle Howell7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Brinkley vs Christine Mannor6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoy Watson / Shari Moxley vs Shannon Lindig / Vanessa Moorman6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Bryant / Kacy Hawkins vs Athena Little / Tracy Bond2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-10-14vs PerezSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDiana Fulkerson / Lynne Reynolds vs Lori Tillery / Debra Weaver3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCristin Liveoak vs Andrea Stewart7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShari Moxley / Joy Watson vs Sylvia Dean / Karen Zecher7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Brinkley / Kimberley Loomis vs Melinda Anderson / Melissa Jose4-6, 1-6
2025-10-05vs Newberry/WisnerLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Brinkley / Diana Fulkerson vs Tamera Balch / Janet Mmbaha1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCristin Liveoak vs Traci Calvert4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoy Watson / Philippa Bianca vs Sabine Newberry / Elizabeth Weiland1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBeth Bryant / Kacy Hawkins vs Kathleen Waite / Jane Bise7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-02vs Green 3.5 FallSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKathy Smith / Diana Fulkerson vs Stacy Mason / Jennifer Daniels2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCristin Liveoak vs Aimee League6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Brinkley / Shari Moxley vs Marianna Wester / Julia Godfrey0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Bryant / Philippa Bianca vs Michelle Jones / Cristy Presson1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN 40N1S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Cristin Liveoak
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Diana Fulkerson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Joy Watson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Lynne Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Kacy Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Philippa Bianca
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Shari Moxley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Jennifer Brinkley
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.93
Jennifer Pease
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Kimberley Loomis
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.88
Jenny Kennamer
published
2.64
Michelle Roth
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberley Loomis + Philippa Bianca6352% games+4.4% vs expected
Jennifer Brinkley + Cristin Liveoak2351% games+1.4% vs expected
Michelle Roth + Shari Moxley2444% games−1.0% vs expected
Philippa Bianca + Joy Watson5351% games−2.1% vs expected
Kacy Hawkins + Joy Watson1442% games−3.0% vs expected
Kimberley Loomis + Michelle Roth71342% games−3.6% vs expected
Jenny Kennamer + Kacy Hawkins1441% games−17.0% vs expected
Kimberley Loomis + Jennifer Brinkley2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cristin Liveoak
46W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Diana Fulkerson
49W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Joy Watson
25W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Lynne Reynolds
44W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Kacy Hawkins
9W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Philippa Bianca
52W–69L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Shari Moxley
19W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
Jennifer Brinkley
27W–70L career · 7 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.94
Jennifer Pease
12W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Kimberley Loomis
79W–96L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jenny Kennamer
24W–29L career · no lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.88
Michelle Roth
27W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.