Teams

RBerliner-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-29vs JLundberg-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesJeron Russell vs Joshua Lundberg3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesWill Hausen vs Al Pick1-6, 0-6
2026-06-15vs APineda-CHTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesRyan Berliner vs Henry Stiepel1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesNick Gilder vs Jonathan Ryan0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJeron Russell vs Andres Pineda6-3, 5-0
2026-06-08vs JMontague-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesNick Gilder vs Andrew Burd6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMark Scherr vs Jeeka Karnas6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-01vs JByrd-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesAubry Carmody vs Oheneba Boateng4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJeron Russell vs Hyunseong Ahn4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesNick Gilder vs Hunter Bassett1-6, 1-6
2026-05-18vs SSelig-HVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesWill Hausen vs William Lucas6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMark Scherr vs Sean Selig6-2, 7-6
L#3 SinglesRyan Berliner vs Alex Herzick6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-05-11vs JLundberg-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDavid Nenon vs Christopher Green6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNick Gilder vs Joshua Lundberg6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-04vs APineda-CHTCLost 12
W#1 SinglesJeron Russell vs Will Lassiter7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRyan Berliner vs Henry Stiepel6-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMark Scherr vs Andres Pineda3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Aubry Carmody
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.96
Jeron Russell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.89
Mark Scherr
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.88
Nick Gilder
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.75
Ryan Berliner
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.73
David Nenon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.63
Will Hausen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeron Russell + Nick Gilder6948% games+3.2% vs expected
Mark Scherr + Ryan Berliner7454% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aubry Carmody
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Jeron Russell
143W–90L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Mark Scherr
144W–67L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Nick Gilder
111W–89L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Ryan Berliner
113W–104L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
David Nenon
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Will Hausen
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.