Teams

EJohnston (Queens)

2024 Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-04vs JBlack (Col Beatty)Won 10
W#3 DoublesEugenia Grow / Janine Rust vs Donna Musante / Kristen Shaeffer6-4, 7-5
2024-08-03vs SReynolds (Park Road)Won 10
W#3 DoublesEugenia Grow / Joni Smith vs Patty Mullins / Christina Thigpen7-5, 6-0
2024-07-25vs JBlack (Col Beatty)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJanine Rust / Mehgan Beverley vs Megan Pruski / Kristen Shaeffer3-6, 1-6
2024-06-27vs JBlack (Col Beatty)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMehgan Beverley / Meredith Tye vs Donna Musante / Kristen Shaeffer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-20vs SReynolds (Park Road)Won 10
W#3 DoublesEugenia Grow / Janine Rust vs Christina Thigpen / Patty Mullins6-1, 6-3
2024-06-06vs JBlack (Col Beatty)Split 11
L#2 DoublesAngela Benson / Kimberly Hoben vs Chelse Stevens / Allison Turner3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMehgan Beverley / Meredith Tye vs Melanie Freeman / Megan Pruski6-4, 6-2
2024-05-30vs SReynolds (Park Road)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEugenia Grow / Joni Smith vs Patty Mullins / Debbie O'Connor4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Kim Cochran
published
3.90
Megan Griffin
published
3.84
Kimberly Hoben
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Angela Benson
published 4
3.68
3.54
Janine Rust
published
3.54
Mehgan Beverley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Eugenia Grow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Claudia Bareis
published
Jenni Beasley
published
Meredith Tye
published
Robin Hurd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Griffin + Kim Cochran224 matchesnot enough data
Eugenia Grow + Elizabeth Johnston123 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Johnston + Megan Griffin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Cochran
27W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
4.24
Megan Griffin
24W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.90
4
Kimberly Hoben
57W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Angela Benson
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Elizabeth Johnston
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Janine Rust
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.54
3.5
Mehgan Beverley
54W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Eugenia Grow
57W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
Claudia Bareis
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jenni Beasley
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meredith Tye
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robin Hurd
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.