Teams

EAnderson-DFC

2026 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Eve

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 10 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
Sep 17 6:30 PM
Duke University Faculty Club
Sep 24 6:30 PM
North Carolina Central University
Oct 1 8:00 PM
Duke University Faculty Club
Oct 8 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Country Club
2026-09-03vs JByrd-NCCULost 12
L#1 DoublesEdward Anderson / Kyle Couch vs Richard McClenny / Christopher Lott4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesErik J Erikson / Brandon Garrett vs Jermaine Byrd / Mike Meske7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEric Labow / Jeffrey Clough vs Barry Gooch / David Schumann6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-20vs GDichter.40C-CHTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesErik J Erikson / Charles Wood vs Nathan Bearman / Jackson Naftel6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEdmund Malesky / Nick Buchler vs Gabriel Dichter / Michael Meltsner1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEdward Anderson / Eric Labow vs Zachary Osofsky / Santha Perian2-6, 0-6
2026-08-13vs JByrd-NCCUWon 21
W#1 DoublesErik J Erikson / Rod Snyder vs Brian Noga / James Klemenz6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEric Labow / Jon Post vs Barry Gooch / David Schumann4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMatt Piland / Nick Buchler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Erik J Erikson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.08
Jeffrey Clough
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Matt Piland
published
4.06
Edmund Malesky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Kyle Couch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Rod Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Edward Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Jon Post
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Nick Buchler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.62
Brandon Garrett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eric Labow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Piland + Kyle Couch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erik J Erikson
23W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.13
Jeffrey Clough
15W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.08
Matt Piland
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
4.06
Edmund Malesky
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
34%65%<1%
4.06
Kyle Couch
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
Rod Snyder
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
Edward Anderson
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Jon Post
67W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Nick Buchler
31W–53L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Brandon Garrett
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Eric Labow
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.